Indigenous knowledge in climate adaptation planning: reflections from initial efforts

There are increasing calls to incorporate indigenous knowledge (IK) into climate adaptation planning (CAP) and related projects. However, given unique attributes of IK and the positionality of tribal communities to scientific research, several considerations are important to ensure CAP efforts with IK are ethical and effective. While such topics have been thoroughly explored conceptually, incorporation of IK into CAP is a nascent field only beginning to report findings and improve science production and delivery. Based on recent work with Ute Mountain Ute (UMU) resource managers and knowledge holders, we reflect on key considerations for incorporating IK into CAP: the importance of sustained and multi-level tribal engagement, operational approaches to IK incorporation, cross-cultural challenges with risk-based approaches, and how CAP can support existing tribal priorities. We hope exploring these considerations can help set appropriate expectations, promote ethical interactions, and increase the effectiveness of tribal CAP and related efforts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Climate
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fclim.2024.1393354
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indigenous knowledge in climate adaptation planning: reflections from initial efforts

Brian W. Miller, Aparna Bamzai‐Dodson, Shelley D. Crausbay, Stefan Tangen et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Climate
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
3.40
article

Indigenous knowledge in climate adaptation planning: reflections from initial efforts

Brian W. Miller, Aparna Bamzai‐Dodson, Shelley D. Crausbay, Stefan Tangen, Meagan F. Oldfather, Tony W. Ciocco
article en
4 citations

Abstract

There are increasing calls to incorporate indigenous knowledge (IK) into climate adaptation planning (CAP) and related projects. However, given unique attributes of IK and the positionality of tribal communities to scientific research, several considerations are important to ensure CAP efforts with IK are ethical and effective. While such topics have been thoroughly explored conceptually, incorporation of IK into CAP is a nascent field only beginning to report findings and improve science production and delivery. Based on recent work with Ute Mountain Ute (UMU) resource managers and knowledge holders, we reflect on key considerations for incorporating IK into CAP: the importance of sustained and multi-level tribal engagement, operational approaches to IK incorporation, cross-cultural challenges with risk-based approaches, and how CAP can support existing tribal priorities. We hope exploring these considerations can help set appropriate expectations, promote ethical interactions, and increase the effectiveness of tribal CAP and related efforts.

Frontiers in ClimateVol. 6
United States Geological Survey (US), US Forest Service (US), North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center
U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Forest Service
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Indigenous Studies and Ecology
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.