Performance of vibration and current signals in the fault diagnosis of induction motors using deep learning and machine learning techniques

Induction motors (IMs) play a pivotal role in various industrial applications, powering critical systems such as pumps, compressors, fans, blowers, and refrigeration and air conditioning systems. Monitoring the health of these IMs is essential for ensuring reliable operation. Numerous sensors, including vibration, current, temperature, acoustic, and power sensors, can be employed for their health monitoring. This article conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of two widely used sensors—vibration and current, for classifying different health states of IMs, such as a healthy condition, bearing fault, and misalignment. The study employed deep learning techniques, specifically 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks, trained on raw data. Additionally, machine learning techniques, including random forest and XGBoost, were utilized and trained on features derived from preprocessed signals using fast Fourier transform and discrete wavelet decomposition. Comparative results indicated that vibration signals achieved remarkably high accuracy, nearly 100%, in detecting the investigated mechanical faults, while current signals, after signal processing and manual feature extraction, achieved an accuracy of 87.41%. These results demonstrate that, though current sensors are a viable alternative to vibration sensors, their performance can be affected by the type and degree of the considered faults. This study also highlights the attributes of vibration and current signals in the health monitoring of rotating machinery such as IMs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Health Monitoring
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14759217241289874
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.61
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of vibration and current signals in the fault diagnosis of induction motors using deep learning and machine learning techniques

Surjya K. Pal, Yinghang He, Samuel Ayankoso, Fengshou Gu et al.
11 citations
Structural Health Monitoring
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
3.61
article

Performance of vibration and current signals in the fault diagnosis of induction motors using deep learning and machine learning techniques

Surjya K. Pal, Yinghang He, Samuel Ayankoso, Fengshou Gu, Ananta Dutta, Andrew D. Ball
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Induction motors (IMs) play a pivotal role in various industrial applications, powering critical systems such as pumps, compressors, fans, blowers, and refrigeration and air conditioning systems. Monitoring the health of these IMs is essential for ensuring reliable operation. Numerous sensors, including vibration, current, temperature, acoustic, and power sensors, can be employed for their health monitoring. This article conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of two widely used sensors—vibration and current, for classifying different health states of IMs, such as a healthy condition, bearing fault, and misalignment. The study employed deep learning techniques, specifically 1D and 2D convolutional neural networks, trained on raw data. Additionally, machine learning techniques, including random forest and XGBoost, were utilized and trained on features derived from preprocessed signals using fast Fourier transform and discrete wavelet decomposition. Comparative results indicated that vibration signals achieved remarkably high accuracy, nearly 100%, in detecting the investigated mechanical faults, while current signals, after signal processing and manual feature extraction, achieved an accuracy of 87.41%. These results demonstrate that, though current sensors are a viable alternative to vibration sensors, their performance can be affected by the type and degree of the considered faults. This study also highlights the attributes of vibration and current signals in the health monitoring of rotating machinery such as IMs.

Structural Health MonitoringVol. 25(1)
University of Huddersfield (GB), Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
3.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.