Human Perception of Robot Failure and Explanation During a Pick-and-Place Task

In recent years, researchers have extensively used non-verbal gestures, such as head and arm movements, to express a robot's intentions and capabilities to humans. Inspired by past research, we investigated how different explanation modalities can aid human understanding and perception of how robots communicate failures and provide explanations during block pick-and-place tasks. Through an in-person, within-subjects experiment with 24 participants, we studied four modes of explanations across four types of failures. Some of these were chosen to mimic combinations from prior work in order to both extend and replicate past findings by the community. We found that speech explanations were preferred to non-verbal and visual cues in terms of similarity to humans. Additionally, projected images had a comparable effect on explanation as other non-verbal modules. We also found consistent results with a prior online study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v4i1.31819
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Robot Manipulation and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Perception of Robot Failure and Explanation During a Pick-and-Place Task

Henry Ngo, Elizabeth Carter, Aaron Steinfeld
2 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Robot Manipulation and Learning
0.66
article

Human Perception of Robot Failure and Explanation During a Pick-and-Place Task

Henry Ngo, Elizabeth Carter, Aaron Steinfeld
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In recent years, researchers have extensively used non-verbal gestures, such as head and arm movements, to express a robot's intentions and capabilities to humans. Inspired by past research, we investigated how different explanation modalities can aid human understanding and perception of how robots communicate failures and provide explanations during block pick-and-place tasks. Through an in-person, within-subjects experiment with 24 participants, we studied four modes of explanations across four types of failures. Some of these were chosen to mimic combinations from prior work in order to both extend and replicate past findings by the community. We found that speech explanations were preferred to non-verbal and visual cues in terms of similarity to humans. Additionally, projected images had a comparable effect on explanation as other non-verbal modules. We also found consistent results with a prior online study.

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 4(1)
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Office of Naval Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Robot Manipulation and Learning
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.