From Bench to Bedside: Implementing AI Ethics as Policies for AI Trustworthiness

It is well known that successful human-AI collaboration depends on the perceived trustworthiness of the AI. We argue that a key to securing trust in such collaborations is ensuring that the AI competently addresses ethics' foundational role in engagements. Specifically, developers need to identify, address, and implement mechanisms for accommodating ethical components of AI choices. We propose an approach that instantiates ethics semantically as ontology-based moral policies. To accommodate the wide variation and interpretation of ethics, we capture such variations into ethics sets, which are situationally specific aggregations of relevant moral policies. We are extending our ontology-based policy management systems with new representations and capabilities to allow trustworthy AI-human ethical collaborative behavior. Moreover, we believe that such AI-human ethical encounters demand that trustworthiness is bi-directional – humans need to be able to assess and calibrate their actions to be consistent with the trustworthiness of AI in a given context, and AIs need to be able to do the same with respect to humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v4i1.31778
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Bench to Bedside: Implementing AI Ethics as Policies for AI Trustworthiness

Larry Bunch, Kristen Brent Venable, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Michael J. Prietula et al.
1 citations
Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
article

From Bench to Bedside: Implementing AI Ethics as Policies for AI Trustworthiness

Larry Bunch, Kristen Brent Venable, Jeffrey M. Bradshaw, Michael J. Prietula, Edward L. Queen, Andrzej Uszok
article en
1 citations

Abstract

It is well known that successful human-AI collaboration depends on the perceived trustworthiness of the AI. We argue that a key to securing trust in such collaborations is ensuring that the AI competently addresses ethics' foundational role in engagements. Specifically, developers need to identify, address, and implement mechanisms for accommodating ethical components of AI choices. We propose an approach that instantiates ethics semantically as ontology-based moral policies. To accommodate the wide variation and interpretation of ethics, we capture such variations into ethics sets, which are situationally specific aggregations of relevant moral policies. We are extending our ontology-based policy management systems with new representations and capabilities to allow trustworthy AI-human ethical collaborative behavior. Moreover, we believe that such AI-human ethical encounters demand that trustworthiness is bi-directional – humans need to be able to assess and calibrate their actions to be consistent with the trustworthiness of AI in a given context, and AIs need to be able to do the same with respect to humans.

Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium SeriesVol. 4(1)
Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (US), Emory University (US), University of West Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
0.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.