Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants to 0.5% of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patient Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy by Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-blind Study

Objective: Abdominal hysterectomy is a common gynecological procedure. While spinal anesthesia offers pain relief, its short analgesic effect is limiting. In this context, there are not many research that examined magnesium sulfate, dexmedetomidine, and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Our research addresses this gap as “Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Abdominal Hysterectomy”. Methods: Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I and II, aged 30–60, planned for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to either dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulfate or control group as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine. The primary objective was to find the effectiveness of the anesthesia in terms of both sensory and motor blocks (onset, duration, and severity), with the secondary objective was to find out any other associated complications. Results: In comparison to the magnesium sulfate group, the dexmedetomidine group’s anesthetic effect began significantly more immediately and persisted much longer ( P < 0.001). The groups did not vary statistically significant in terms of side effects or hemodynamic instability. Conclusion: Adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulfate along with hyperbaric bupivacaine, for abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia, provide effective anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine (10 µg) and magnesium sulfate (100 mg) both showed safe intrathecal adjuvant usage. Remarkably, dexmedetomidine surpasses magnesium sulfate by swiftly inducing sensory and motor blocks, extending their duration, and enhancing analgesia. Notably, both adjuncts yield no adverse effects. Overall, these findings underscore the potential of dexmedetomidine as a more effective adjuvant in spinal anesthesia protocols for abdominal hysterectomy procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of African Medicine
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_60_24
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants to 0.5% of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patient Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy by Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-blind Study

Usha Suwalka, Tushar Kumar, Bharati, Priyanka Oraon et al.
2 citations
Annals of African Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
1.15
article

Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants to 0.5% of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Patient Undergoing Abdominal Hysterectomy by Spinal Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-blind Study

Usha Suwalka, Tushar Kumar, Bharati, Priyanka Oraon, P.K. RAY, Mukesh Kumar, Sourabh Kumar
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: Abdominal hysterectomy is a common gynecological procedure. While spinal anesthesia offers pain relief, its short analgesic effect is limiting. In this context, there are not many research that examined magnesium sulfate, dexmedetomidine, and 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Our research addresses this gap as “Comparing Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants to Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Abdominal Hysterectomy”. Methods: Ninety patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I and II, aged 30–60, planned for abdominal hysterectomy were randomized to either dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulfate or control group as adjuvants to hyperbaric bupivacaine. The primary objective was to find the effectiveness of the anesthesia in terms of both sensory and motor blocks (onset, duration, and severity), with the secondary objective was to find out any other associated complications. Results: In comparison to the magnesium sulfate group, the dexmedetomidine group’s anesthetic effect began significantly more immediately and persisted much longer ( P < 0.001). The groups did not vary statistically significant in terms of side effects or hemodynamic instability. Conclusion: Adjuvants such as dexmedetomidine or magnesium sulfate along with hyperbaric bupivacaine, for abdominal hysterectomy under spinal anesthesia, provide effective anesthesia. Dexmedetomidine (10 µg) and magnesium sulfate (100 mg) both showed safe intrathecal adjuvant usage. Remarkably, dexmedetomidine surpasses magnesium sulfate by swiftly inducing sensory and motor blocks, extending their duration, and enhancing analgesia. Notably, both adjuncts yield no adverse effects. Overall, these findings underscore the potential of dexmedetomidine as a more effective adjuvant in spinal anesthesia protocols for abdominal hysterectomy procedures.

Annals of African MedicineVol. 24(1)
Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.