Mapping the Scientific Shreds on Barriers to SMEs’ Innovation

The present study aims to showcase the vital contributions to innovation barriers in the context of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) for 1975–2022. With the help of VOSviewer, this bibliometric analysis employs a quantitative method based on documents retrieved from SCOPUS database to assess historical patterns, results and the key elements affecting open innovation in SMEs. The results show an upward trend of research publications in the totality of the 222 documents contributed by 160 authors from 59 countries. The majority of research was conducted in developed countries. Findings also reveal the most cited research articles, keyword analysis, country collaboration and the number of documents published yearly. Language bias may occur as this bibliometric study only included literature written in a single language. Consequently, studies released in other languages may go unnoticed. This study is helpful for policymakers to provide a conducive environment for innovation among SMEs to keep economic growth on priority. This study offers the first comprehensive assessment of innovation barriers in a holistic manner. With the help of bibliometric analysis, the study assesses the intellectual framework of open innovation in SMEs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SEDME (Small Enterprises Development Management & Extension Journal) A worldwide window on MSME Studies
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09708464241291290
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping the Scientific Shreds on Barriers to SMEs’ Innovation

Sapna Arora, Disha Gulia, Kumar Rahul
SEDME (Small Enterprises Development Management & Extension Journal) A worldwide window on MSME Studies
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

Mapping the Scientific Shreds on Barriers to SMEs’ Innovation

Sapna Arora, Disha Gulia, Kumar Rahul
article en

Abstract

The present study aims to showcase the vital contributions to innovation barriers in the context of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) for 1975–2022. With the help of VOSviewer, this bibliometric analysis employs a quantitative method based on documents retrieved from SCOPUS database to assess historical patterns, results and the key elements affecting open innovation in SMEs. The results show an upward trend of research publications in the totality of the 222 documents contributed by 160 authors from 59 countries. The majority of research was conducted in developed countries. Findings also reveal the most cited research articles, keyword analysis, country collaboration and the number of documents published yearly. Language bias may occur as this bibliometric study only included literature written in a single language. Consequently, studies released in other languages may go unnoticed. This study is helpful for policymakers to provide a conducive environment for innovation among SMEs to keep economic growth on priority. This study offers the first comprehensive assessment of innovation barriers in a holistic manner. With the help of bibliometric analysis, the study assesses the intellectual framework of open innovation in SMEs.

SEDME (Small Enterprises Development Management & Extension Journal) A worldwide window on MSME StudiesVol. 52(1)
National Institute of Food Technology Entrepreneurship and Management (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.