An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations

Abstract. We reviewed 60 sensor networks and 17 related efforts (sensor review papers and data accessibility projects) to better understand the landscape of stationary low-cost gas-phase sensor networks deployed in outdoor environments worldwide. This study is not exhaustive of every gas-phase sensor network on the globe but rather exists to categorize types of sensor networks by their key characteristics and explore general trends. This also exposes gaps in monitoring efforts to date, especially regarding the availability of gas-phase measurements compared to particulate matter (PM) and geographic coverage gaps (the Global South, rural areas). We categorize ground-based networks that measure gas-phase air pollutants into two main subsets based on their deployment type – quasi-permanent (long term) and campaign (short to medium term) – and explore commonplace practices, strengths, and weaknesses of stationary monitoring networks. We conclude with a summary of cross-network unification and quality control efforts. This work aims to help scientists looking to build a sensor network explore best practices and common pathways and aid end users in finding low-cost sensor datasets that meet their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-6425-2024
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations

Laura T. Iraci, Kristen Okorn
18 citations
Atmospheric measurement techniques
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.70
article

An overview of outdoor low-cost gas-phase air quality sensor deployments: current efforts, trends, and limitations

Laura T. Iraci, Kristen Okorn
article en
18 citations

Abstract

Abstract. We reviewed 60 sensor networks and 17 related efforts (sensor review papers and data accessibility projects) to better understand the landscape of stationary low-cost gas-phase sensor networks deployed in outdoor environments worldwide. This study is not exhaustive of every gas-phase sensor network on the globe but rather exists to categorize types of sensor networks by their key characteristics and explore general trends. This also exposes gaps in monitoring efforts to date, especially regarding the availability of gas-phase measurements compared to particulate matter (PM) and geographic coverage gaps (the Global South, rural areas). We categorize ground-based networks that measure gas-phase air pollutants into two main subsets based on their deployment type – quasi-permanent (long term) and campaign (short to medium term) – and explore commonplace practices, strengths, and weaknesses of stationary monitoring networks. We conclude with a summary of cross-network unification and quality control efforts. This work aims to help scientists looking to build a sensor network explore best practices and common pathways and aid end users in finding low-cost sensor datasets that meet their needs.

Atmospheric measurement techniquesVol. 17(21)
Ames Research Center (US), Oak Ridge Associated Universities (US), NASA Research Park (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Ames Research Center
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
3.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.