Understanding and measuring EUV mask 3D effects

EUV lithography is rapidly being pushed to its resolution limit, where tradeoffs are heightened among resolution, throughput, and stochastics. Mitigation strategies include attenuated phase shift masks (aPSMs) and thinner high-k absorbers. Furthermore, multilayer bandwidth and phase shift may need to be reassessed. All these improvements relate to mask 3D effects (M3Ds), arising from several causes: first, phase shift versus pitch, which sets the aPSM target phase shift around 1.2π instead of π; second, absorber thickness effects, which directly relate to the promise of high-k absorbers; and third, multilayer effects such as bandwidth and phase versus angle. We quantify these effects in simulation for different EUV scanner generations (0.33 and 0.55 NA). Moreover, we demonstrate the measurement of these effects with the EUV Tech ENK (EUV N&K and Phase Measurement Tool) using actinic scatterometry. The complexity of M3Ds suggests that new metrics of multilayer and absorber performance beyond reflectivity will need to be considered. Actinic scatterometry provides a promising route to measuring M3Ds due to its sensitivity to wavelength, angle, and feature size.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmm.23.4.041407
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding and measuring EUV mask 3D effects

Patrick Naulleau, Dave Houser, Stuart Sherwin, Matt Hettermann
1 citations
Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
0.21
article

Understanding and measuring EUV mask 3D effects

Patrick Naulleau, Dave Houser, Stuart Sherwin, Matt Hettermann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

EUV lithography is rapidly being pushed to its resolution limit, where tradeoffs are heightened among resolution, throughput, and stochastics. Mitigation strategies include attenuated phase shift masks (aPSMs) and thinner high-k absorbers. Furthermore, multilayer bandwidth and phase shift may need to be reassessed. All these improvements relate to mask 3D effects (M3Ds), arising from several causes: first, phase shift versus pitch, which sets the aPSM target phase shift around 1.2π instead of π; second, absorber thickness effects, which directly relate to the promise of high-k absorbers; and third, multilayer effects such as bandwidth and phase versus angle. We quantify these effects in simulation for different EUV scanner generations (0.33 and 0.55 NA). Moreover, we demonstrate the measurement of these effects with the EUV Tech ENK (EUV N&K and Phase Measurement Tool) using actinic scatterometry. The complexity of M3Ds suggests that new metrics of multilayer and absorber performance beyond reflectivity will need to be considered. Actinic scatterometry provides a promising route to measuring M3Ds due to its sensitivity to wavelength, angle, and feature size.

Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and MetrologyVol. 23(04)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Advancements in Photolithography Techniques
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Understanding and measuring EUV mask 3D effects — Patrick Naulleau, Dave Houser, et al. · Journal of Micro/Nanopatterning Materials and Metrology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS