Results from a multi-laboratory ocean metaproteomic intercomparison: effects of LC-MS acquisition and data analysis procedures

Abstract. Metaproteomics is an increasingly popular methodology that provides information regarding the metabolic functions of specific microbial taxa and has potential for contributing to ocean ecology and biogeochemical studies. A blinded multi-laboratory intercomparison was conducted to assess comparability and reproducibility of taxonomic and functional results and their sensitivity to methodological variables. Euphotic zone samples from the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) in the North Atlantic Ocean collected by in situ pumps and the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) Clio were distributed with a paired metagenome, and one-dimensional (1D) liquid chromatographic data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry analysis was stipulated. Analysis of mass spectra from seven laboratories through a common bioinformatic pipeline identified a shared set of 1056 proteins from 1395 shared peptide constituents. Quantitative analyses showed good reproducibility: pairwise regressions of spectral counts between laboratories yielded R2 values averaged 0.62±0.11, and a Sørensen similarity analysis of the top 1000 proteins revealed 70 %–80 % similarity between laboratory groups. Taxonomic and functional assignments showed good coherence between technical replicates and different laboratories. A bioinformatic intercomparison study, involving 10 laboratories using eight software packages, successfully identified thousands of peptides within the complex metaproteomic datasets, demonstrating the utility of these software tools for ocean metaproteomic research. Lessons learned and potential improvements in methods were described. Future efforts could examine reproducibility in deeper metaproteomes, examine accuracy in targeted absolute quantitation analyses, and develop standards for data output formats to improve data interoperability. Together, these results demonstrate the reproducibility of metaproteomic analyses and their suitability for microbial oceanography research, including integration into global-scale ocean surveys and ocean biogeochemical models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-21-4889-2024
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results from a multi-laboratory ocean metaproteomic intercomparison: effects of LC-MS acquisition and data analysis procedures

Andrew T. Rajczewski, Margaret Mars Brisbin, Robert L. Hettich, Zihao Zhao et al.
10 citations
Biogeosciences
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
2.41
article

Results from a multi-laboratory ocean metaproteomic intercomparison: effects of LC-MS acquisition and data analysis procedures

Andrew T. Rajczewski, Margaret Mars Brisbin, Robert L. Hettich, Zihao Zhao, Sophie M. Colston, Martin Pabst, Jaimee R. Compton, Ryan Mueller, Timothy J. Griffin, Dagmar H. Leary, J. Scott P. McCain, Gary J. Vora, Richard J. Giannone, J. A. Breier, Benjamin A. Neely, Gerhard J. Herndl, Brian C. Searle, Elden Rowland, Hugo B.C. Kleikamp, Megan Duffy, Mak A. Saito, Jacob Waldbauer, Eli K. Moore, Erin M. Bertrand, Michael V. Jakuba, Jaclyn K. Saunders, Pratik Dilip Jagtap, Samantha L. Peters, Haiyan Zheng, Michael G. Janech, Tim Van Den Bossche, Brook L. Nunn, Subina Mehta, W. Judson Hervey, Dawn M. Moran, Matthew R. McIlvin, Jim Johnson, Rick Keil, Rod Johnson
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract. Metaproteomics is an increasingly popular methodology that provides information regarding the metabolic functions of specific microbial taxa and has potential for contributing to ocean ecology and biogeochemical studies. A blinded multi-laboratory intercomparison was conducted to assess comparability and reproducibility of taxonomic and functional results and their sensitivity to methodological variables. Euphotic zone samples from the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study (BATS) in the North Atlantic Ocean collected by in situ pumps and the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV) Clio were distributed with a paired metagenome, and one-dimensional (1D) liquid chromatographic data-dependent acquisition mass spectrometry analysis was stipulated. Analysis of mass spectra from seven laboratories through a common bioinformatic pipeline identified a shared set of 1056 proteins from 1395 shared peptide constituents. Quantitative analyses showed good reproducibility: pairwise regressions of spectral counts between laboratories yielded R2 values averaged 0.62±0.11, and a Sørensen similarity analysis of the top 1000 proteins revealed 70 %–80 % similarity between laboratory groups. Taxonomic and functional assignments showed good coherence between technical replicates and different laboratories. A bioinformatic intercomparison study, involving 10 laboratories using eight software packages, successfully identified thousands of peptides within the complex metaproteomic datasets, demonstrating the utility of these software tools for ocean metaproteomic research. Lessons learned and potential improvements in methods were described. Future efforts could examine reproducibility in deeper metaproteomes, examine accuracy in targeted absolute quantitation analyses, and develop standards for data output formats to improve data interoperability. Together, these results demonstrate the reproducibility of metaproteomic analyses and their suitability for microbial oceanography research, including integration into global-scale ocean surveys and ocean biogeochemical models.

BiogeosciencesVol. 21(21)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), United States Geological Survey (US), United States Naval Research Laboratory (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US), University of Vienna (AT), Dalhousie University (CA), University of Minnesota (US), Bermuda Institute of Ocean Sciences (BM), Oregon State University (US), National Institute of Standards and Technology (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Washington (US), College of Charleston (US), University of Minnesota System (US), Ghent University Hospital (BE), University of Georgia Press (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), Ghent University (BE), University of Chicago (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL), NCCOS Hollings Marine Laboratory (US), VIB-UGent Center for Medical Biotechnology (BE), Naval Research Laboratory Center for Bio/Molecular Science and Engineering, United States Navy (US), Rowan University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Seattle University (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US), Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (US), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Directorate for Geosciences
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
2.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.