Evaluating patient and public involvement in trial design within EJS ACT-PD: interim findings

<h3>Background</h3> The Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in Parkinson’s Disease (EJS ACT- PD) initiative is a UK-wide consortium of &gt;90 members designing a platform disease- modification trial for PD with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) at its heart. <h3>Aim</h3> To improve PPIE within EJS ACT-PD by evaluating members’ perceptions and identify areas for improvement through a mixed methods research-in-action study. <h3>Methods</h3> All consortium members were invited to complete the Patient Engagement in Research Scale-22 (PEIRS-22) at two time-points six months apart; purposively sampled participants were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews conducted after the first survey, which were thematically analysed to identify overall impressions and areas for improvement, and inform action implementation. <h3>Results</h3> 31/72 professional and 10/14 PPIE members completed PEIRS-22 at both time points. Nine PPIE and ten professional consortium members participated in interviews. Actions implemented included: team building (additional in person meetings), improving proactive PPIE-member involvement in meetings, increasing awareness of their skills, improving workload and co-evolving PPIE with project phases. This improved PPIE members’ PEIRS-22 domain scores for contributions, support, feeling valued and benefits. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Ongoing evaluation and iteration of PPIE processes and impact can improve PPIE. Learnings will help inform future patient-centred research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-abn.192
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating patient and public involvement in trial design within EJS ACT-PD: interim findings

Carroll Camille B, Foltynie Thomas, McFarthing Kevin, Ellis-Doyle Romy et al.
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Evaluating patient and public involvement in trial design within EJS ACT-PD: interim findings

Carroll Camille B, Foltynie Thomas, McFarthing Kevin, Ellis-Doyle Romy, Zeissler Marie-Louise, Luz Mar�a Ru�z-Godoy R, Gonzalez-Robles Cristina, Cowd Elaine, Petty Rebecca
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> The Edmond J Safra Accelerating Clinical Trials in Parkinson’s Disease (EJS ACT- PD) initiative is a UK-wide consortium of &gt;90 members designing a platform disease- modification trial for PD with patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) at its heart. <h3>Aim</h3> To improve PPIE within EJS ACT-PD by evaluating members’ perceptions and identify areas for improvement through a mixed methods research-in-action study. <h3>Methods</h3> All consortium members were invited to complete the Patient Engagement in Research Scale-22 (PEIRS-22) at two time-points six months apart; purposively sampled participants were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews conducted after the first survey, which were thematically analysed to identify overall impressions and areas for improvement, and inform action implementation. <h3>Results</h3> 31/72 professional and 10/14 PPIE members completed PEIRS-22 at both time points. Nine PPIE and ten professional consortium members participated in interviews. Actions implemented included: team building (additional in person meetings), improving proactive PPIE-member involvement in meetings, increasing awareness of their skills, improving workload and co-evolving PPIE with project phases. This improved PPIE members’ PEIRS-22 domain scores for contributions, support, feeling valued and benefits. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Ongoing evaluation and iteration of PPIE processes and impact can improve PPIE. Learnings will help inform future patient-centred research.

Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (US), University College London (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating patient and public involvement in trial design within EJS ACT-PD: interim findings — Carroll Camille B, Foltynie Thomas, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS