Non-cooperative target track prediction method based on Attention-LSTM

The traditional LSTM network cannot predict the track of non-cooperative targets, because the data collected from non-cooperative targets has partial data loss, and it cannot form equal interval sampling data. The cubic spline method can be used to interpolate the data at equal intervals, but the contribution of the interpolated points to track prediction is much lower than that of the measured points. Therefore, the contribution matrix of track prediction is constructed by the Attention mechanism, and the weight matrix of LSTM network training is used to determine track prediction together. The experimental results show that the average accuracy of the test set can reach 96.25%, and the loss function value is about 0.125. The prediction accuracy is improved by 14.8% compared to traditional LSTM networks, which verifies the practicability and effectiveness of this method in non-cooperative target track prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3049649
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and ELM
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-cooperative target track prediction method based on Attention-LSTM

Zhiyuan Lu, Pan Zhao, Jiaolong Wen, Yao Yu et al.
Machine Learning and ELM
article

Non-cooperative target track prediction method based on Attention-LSTM

Zhiyuan Lu, Pan Zhao, Jiaolong Wen, Yao Yu, Pengbo Zhu
article en

Abstract

The traditional LSTM network cannot predict the track of non-cooperative targets, because the data collected from non-cooperative targets has partial data loss, and it cannot form equal interval sampling data. The cubic spline method can be used to interpolate the data at equal intervals, but the contribution of the interpolated points to track prediction is much lower than that of the measured points. Therefore, the contribution matrix of track prediction is constructed by the Attention mechanism, and the weight matrix of LSTM network training is used to determine track prediction together. The experimental results show that the average accuracy of the test set can reach 96.25%, and the loss function value is about 0.125. The prediction accuracy is improved by 14.8% compared to traditional LSTM networks, which verifies the practicability and effectiveness of this method in non-cooperative target track prediction.

58.com (China) (CN)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Machine Learning and ELM
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.