Transport coefficient sensitivities in a semi-analytic model for magnetized liner inertial fusion

Performance of magnetized liner inertial fusion (MagLIF) experiments is highly dependent on transport processes including magnetized heat flows and magnetic flux losses. Magnetohydrodynamic simulations used to model these experiments require a choice of model for the transport coefficients, which are the constants of proportionality relating driving terms, such as temperature gradients and currents, to the associated heat and magnetic field transport. The coefficients have been the subject of repeated recalculation using various methods throughout the years. Using a semi-analytic MagLIF model [McBride and Slutz, Phys. Plasmas 22, 052708 (2015)], we compare models for the transport coefficients provided by Braginskii [Reviews of Plasma Physics, edited by M. A. Leontovich (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1965), Vol. 1, p. 205], Epperlein and Haines [Phys. Fluids 29, 1029 (1986)], Ji and Held [Phys. Plasmas 20, 042114 (2013)], Davies et al. [Phys. Plasmas 28, 012305 (2021)], and Sadler et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 075001 (2021)]. The choice of model modifies magnetic-flux losses caused by the Nernst thermoelectric effect and thermal conduction losses. We present simulated results from parameter scans conducted in order to compare the effects of the different models on parameters of interest in MagLIF. In some regions of parameter space, discrepancies of up to 38% are found in integrated quantities like the fusion yield. These results may serve as a guide for experimental validation of the various models, particularly as laser preheat energies and initial axial field strengths are increased on MagLIF experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Plasmas
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0221649
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.66

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transport coefficient sensitivities in a semi-analytic model for magnetized liner inertial fusion

R. D. McBride, J. R. Davies, Y. Lawrence, A. B. Sefkow
1 citations
Physics of Plasmas
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
0.66
article

Transport coefficient sensitivities in a semi-analytic model for magnetized liner inertial fusion

R. D. McBride, J. R. Davies, Y. Lawrence, A. B. Sefkow
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Performance of magnetized liner inertial fusion (MagLIF) experiments is highly dependent on transport processes including magnetized heat flows and magnetic flux losses. Magnetohydrodynamic simulations used to model these experiments require a choice of model for the transport coefficients, which are the constants of proportionality relating driving terms, such as temperature gradients and currents, to the associated heat and magnetic field transport. The coefficients have been the subject of repeated recalculation using various methods throughout the years. Using a semi-analytic MagLIF model [McBride and Slutz, Phys. Plasmas 22, 052708 (2015)], we compare models for the transport coefficients provided by Braginskii [Reviews of Plasma Physics, edited by M. A. Leontovich (Consultants Bureau, New York, 1965), Vol. 1, p. 205], Epperlein and Haines [Phys. Fluids 29, 1029 (1986)], Ji and Held [Phys. Plasmas 20, 042114 (2013)], Davies et al. [Phys. Plasmas 28, 012305 (2021)], and Sadler et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 075001 (2021)]. The choice of model modifies magnetic-flux losses caused by the Nernst thermoelectric effect and thermal conduction losses. We present simulated results from parameter scans conducted in order to compare the effects of the different models on parameters of interest in MagLIF. In some regions of parameter space, discrepancies of up to 38% are found in integrated quantities like the fusion yield. These results may serve as a guide for experimental validation of the various models, particularly as laser preheat energies and initial axial field strengths are increased on MagLIF experiments.

Physics of PlasmasVol. 31(11)
University of Michigan (US), Energetics (United States) (US), Fusion (United States) (US), Plasma Technology (United States) (US), Fusion Academy (US), University of Rochester (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, University of Rochester, Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy, Office of Science, National Nuclear Security Administration, Advanced Research Projects Agency
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
0.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.