Improving recruitment and retention of people with Parkinson’s disease to clinical studies

<h3>Background</h3> Timely recruitment and effective retention of participants are challenging for clinical Parkinson’s disease (PD) research studies. Not achieving this can affect delivery costs and bias results. <h3>Aim</h3> To identify successful recruitment and retention methodologies for clinical research studies in PD. <h3>Method</h3> We conducted a systematic scoping review using a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Studies (PICOS) framework to search and screen literature within five databases for published quantitative and mixed methods studies evaluating recruitment and retention strategies of interventional and observational trials in PD. <h3>Results</h3> Searches identified 4,608 records, of which six papers covering eight studies were included in the review following screening for eligibility. No papers on retention strategies were found that met eligibility criteria. Effective strategies for rapid recruitment included digital marketing campaigns (n=3), local community events (n=1), site recruitment support (n=1) and multiple referral sources (n=2). Recruitment diversity was increased by online campaigns, mandatory 10% minority inclusion set by funders and supplemental site funding. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This scoping review has identified methods that can be used to increase the rate and diversity of recruitment to PD clinical studies. Retention methodologies are under-researched.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2024-abn.176
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving recruitment and retention of people with Parkinson’s disease to clinical studies

Carroll Camille B, Foltynie Thomas, Mills Georgia, Collins Sally et al.
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Improving recruitment and retention of people with Parkinson’s disease to clinical studies

Carroll Camille B, Foltynie Thomas, Mills Georgia, Collins Sally, Ellis-Doyle Romy, Zeissler Marie-Louise, Mullin Stephen, Gonzalez-Robles Cristina, Petty Rebecca
article en

Abstract

<h3>Background</h3> Timely recruitment and effective retention of participants are challenging for clinical Parkinson’s disease (PD) research studies. Not achieving this can affect delivery costs and bias results. <h3>Aim</h3> To identify successful recruitment and retention methodologies for clinical research studies in PD. <h3>Method</h3> We conducted a systematic scoping review using a Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Studies (PICOS) framework to search and screen literature within five databases for published quantitative and mixed methods studies evaluating recruitment and retention strategies of interventional and observational trials in PD. <h3>Results</h3> Searches identified 4,608 records, of which six papers covering eight studies were included in the review following screening for eligibility. No papers on retention strategies were found that met eligibility criteria. Effective strategies for rapid recruitment included digital marketing campaigns (n=3), local community events (n=1), site recruitment support (n=1) and multiple referral sources (n=2). Recruitment diversity was increased by online campaigns, mandatory 10% minority inclusion set by funders and supplemental site funding. <h3>Conclusions</h3> This scoping review has identified methods that can be used to increase the rate and diversity of recruitment to PD clinical studies. Retention methodologies are under-researched.

University College London (GB), Newcastle University (GB), University of Plymouth (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.