Atoms and Subtle matter: Henry Power’s observations on plants in <i>Experimental Philosophy</i>

This paper examines Henry Power’s Experimental philosophy and suggests that Power’s observations of and experiments with plants were not used to reconcile Cartesian corpuscularianism with different approaches that stress the subtle character of matter. Instead, their purpose was rather to determine the nature of seeds and their role in the process of plant generation, i.e. whether they are containers of the ultimate division of matter (atoms) or parts of matter endowed with formative power. My argument starts with a discussion of Power’s presentation on the role of seeds in the process of plant generation in his Experimental philosophy . I claim that Power compares plant seeds to atoms, and that he does not strictly interpret seeds/atoms in the Cartesian corpuscularian and mechanical fashion. Power’s ‘atoms’ are of two kinds—subtle and grosser—where the subtle has the property to trigger natural processes. Moreover, I interpret seeds as parts of matter endowed with creative properties as an addition to the preformist interpretation of Power’s position on plant generation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2024.0007
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atoms and Subtle matter: Henry Power’s observations on plants in Experimental Philosophy

Oana Matei
1 citations
Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
0.60
article

Atoms and Subtle matter: Henry Power’s observations on plants in Experimental Philosophy

Oana Matei
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper examines Henry Power’s Experimental philosophy and suggests that Power’s observations of and experiments with plants were not used to reconcile Cartesian corpuscularianism with different approaches that stress the subtle character of matter. Instead, their purpose was rather to determine the nature of seeds and their role in the process of plant generation, i.e. whether they are containers of the ultimate division of matter (atoms) or parts of matter endowed with formative power. My argument starts with a discussion of Power’s presentation on the role of seeds in the process of plant generation in his Experimental philosophy . I claim that Power compares plant seeds to atoms, and that he does not strictly interpret seeds/atoms in the Cartesian corpuscularian and mechanical fashion. Power’s ‘atoms’ are of two kinds—subtle and grosser—where the subtle has the property to trigger natural processes. Moreover, I interpret seeds as parts of matter endowed with creative properties as an addition to the preformist interpretation of Power’s position on plant generation.

Notes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of ScienceVol. 79(1)
University of Bucharest (RO), Vasile Goldis Western University of Arad (RO)
Unitatea Executiva pentru Finantarea Invatamantului Superior, a Cercetarii, Dezvoltarii si Inovarii
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Plant and Biological Electrophysiology Studies
0.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.