Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well established. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study utilized electronic medical records from a center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged <i>≥</i>18 years with <i>≥</i>2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups: TGNB (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary [NB]-assigned male at birth, NB-assigned female at birth), cisgender men, and cisgender women. The primary outcome was any arrhythmia using age- and race-adjusted regression models comparing transgender patients with cisgender men and cisgender women. Prevalence of arrhythmias was explored in transgender people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sample included 49,862 adults, with 7121 (14%) TGNB persons. Median age was 28 years. Prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% NB persons, 1.4-1.5% transgender persons). After adjustment, transgender women and transgender men had similar odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender men (transgender women: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.52; transgender men: aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.62, <i>p</i> = 0.37), but higher odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender women (transgender women: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01; transgender men: aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.48-3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among transgender adults regardless of GAHT use (transgender men: 1.5% vs 1.9%, transgender women: 1.2% vs 2.1%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
LGBT Health
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2024.0151
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients

Dana King, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Carl G. Streed, Emelia J. Benjamin et al.
1 citations
LGBT Health
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
article

Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients

Dana King, Sandhiya Ravichandran, Carl G. Streed, Emelia J. Benjamin, Lauren B. Beach, Ayelet Shapira‐Daniels, Sari L. Reisner, Robert Helm, Oseiwe Eromosele
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Sex differences in cardiac arrhythmias are well established. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of arrhythmias in transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) adults. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This cross-sectional study utilized electronic medical records from a center specializing in TGNB care. Adults aged <i>≥</i>18 years with <i>≥</i>2 medical visits between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2021, were categorized into self-reported gender groups: TGNB (transgender men, transgender women, nonbinary [NB]-assigned male at birth, NB-assigned female at birth), cisgender men, and cisgender women. The primary outcome was any arrhythmia using age- and race-adjusted regression models comparing transgender patients with cisgender men and cisgender women. Prevalence of arrhythmias was explored in transgender people with a gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescription. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The sample included 49,862 adults, with 7121 (14%) TGNB persons. Median age was 28 years. Prevalence of arrhythmias was low (0.7-1.4% NB persons, 1.4-1.5% transgender persons). After adjustment, transgender women and transgender men had similar odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender men (transgender women: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-1.24, <i>p</i> = 0.52; transgender men: aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.82-1.62, <i>p</i> = 0.37), but higher odds of any arrhythmia compared with cisgender women (transgender women: aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.13-2.34, <i>p</i> = 0.01; transgender men: aOR 2.15, 95% CI 1.48-3.04, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Prevalence of arrhythmias appeared similar among transgender adults regardless of GAHT use (transgender men: 1.5% vs 1.9%, transgender women: 1.2% vs 2.1%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Further research examining arrhythmias in TGNB patients and across gender minority subgroups is warranted, including longitudinal studies evaluating the potential impact of GAHT.

LGBT HealthVol. 12(4)
Boston University (US), Northwestern University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), University of Michigan (US), Office of Minority Health (US), Fenway Health (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.