On machine learning, myths about General AI, and what understanding is

The first part of the article discusses the book The Myth of Artificial Intelligence by American scientist and entrepreneur E. Larson, which focuses on debunking some myths about artificial intelligence. These myths, which have persisted for over half a century, suggest that the emergence of human-like ("general") AI and eventually superintelligence is inevitable, occurring naturally as AI systems evolve. The book criticizes these myths in two ways: scientific and social. It is shown that machine learning does not lead to general AI, and the myth of AI makes human potential look weaker. The second part of the article considers the problem of understanding. The concept of cognitive semantics is proposed, based on the ideas of J. Lakoff, S. Pinker, A. Damasio and A. Seth. In particular, it is noted that: understanding is an interpretation in terms of a person’s picture of the world; the picture of the world is constructed by our brain, and it is structured through the categorization of human experience; meanings (senses) are formed earlier than conceptual structures are formed; biological goals underlie meanings; not only the brain but also the body participates in cognitive processes, and understanding is associated with actions in the environment, knowledge of which is contained in the picture of the world. The article concludes by pointing out dead ends, difficulties and dangers on the path to general AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ontology of Designing
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18287/2223-9537-2024-14-4-466-482
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On machine learning, myths about General AI, and what understanding is

О. П. Кузнецов
Ontology of Designing
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
article

On machine learning, myths about General AI, and what understanding is

О. П. Кузнецов
article en

Abstract

The first part of the article discusses the book The Myth of Artificial Intelligence by American scientist and entrepreneur E. Larson, which focuses on debunking some myths about artificial intelligence. These myths, which have persisted for over half a century, suggest that the emergence of human-like ("general") AI and eventually superintelligence is inevitable, occurring naturally as AI systems evolve. The book criticizes these myths in two ways: scientific and social. It is shown that machine learning does not lead to general AI, and the myth of AI makes human potential look weaker. The second part of the article considers the problem of understanding. The concept of cognitive semantics is proposed, based on the ideas of J. Lakoff, S. Pinker, A. Damasio and A. Seth. In particular, it is noted that: understanding is an interpretation in terms of a person’s picture of the world; the picture of the world is constructed by our brain, and it is structured through the categorization of human experience; meanings (senses) are formed earlier than conceptual structures are formed; biological goals underlie meanings; not only the brain but also the body participates in cognitive processes, and understanding is associated with actions in the environment, knowledge of which is contained in the picture of the world. The article concludes by pointing out dead ends, difficulties and dangers on the path to general AI.

Ontology of DesigningVol. 14(4)
V. A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.