Decomposing dynamical subprocesses for compositional generalization

A striking feature of human cognition is an exceptional ability to rapidly adapt to novel situations. It is proposed this relies on abstracting and generalizing past experiences. While previous research has explored how humans detect and generalize single sequential processes, we have a limited understanding of how humans adapt to more naturalistic scenarios, for example, complex, multisubprocess environments. Here, we propose a candidate computational mechanism that posits compositional generalization of knowledge about subprocess dynamics. In two samples (<i>N</i> = 238 and <i>N</i> = 137), we combined a novel sequence learning task and computational modeling to ask whether humans extract and generalize subprocesses compositionally to solve new problems. In prior learning, participants experienced sequences of compound images formed from two graphs' product spaces (group 1: G1 and G2, group 2: G3 and G4). In transfer learning, both groups encountered compound images from the product of G1 and G3, composed entirely of new images. We show that subprocess knowledge transferred between task phases, such that in a new task environment each group had enhanced accuracy in predicting subprocess dynamics they had experienced during prior learning. Computational models utilizing predictive representations, based solely on the temporal contiguity of experienced task states, without an ability to transfer knowledge, failed to explain these data. Instead, behavior was consistent with a predictive representation model that maps task states between prior and transfer learning. These results help advance a mechanistic understanding of how humans discover and abstract subprocesses composing their experiences and compositionally reuse prior knowledge as a scaffolding for new experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408134121
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Advanced Algebra and Logic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decomposing dynamical subprocesses for compositional generalization

Lennart Luettgau, Kimberly Stachenfeld, Raymond J. Dolan, Zeb Kurth‐Nelson et al.
9 citations
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Advanced Algebra and Logic
3.25
article

Decomposing dynamical subprocesses for compositional generalization

Lennart Luettgau, Kimberly Stachenfeld, Raymond J. Dolan, Zeb Kurth‐Nelson, Sebastijan Veselič, Rani Moran, Tore Erdmann
article en
9 citations

Abstract

A striking feature of human cognition is an exceptional ability to rapidly adapt to novel situations. It is proposed this relies on abstracting and generalizing past experiences. While previous research has explored how humans detect and generalize single sequential processes, we have a limited understanding of how humans adapt to more naturalistic scenarios, for example, complex, multisubprocess environments. Here, we propose a candidate computational mechanism that posits compositional generalization of knowledge about subprocess dynamics. In two samples (<i>N</i> = 238 and <i>N</i> = 137), we combined a novel sequence learning task and computational modeling to ask whether humans extract and generalize subprocesses compositionally to solve new problems. In prior learning, participants experienced sequences of compound images formed from two graphs' product spaces (group 1: G1 and G2, group 2: G3 and G4). In transfer learning, both groups encountered compound images from the product of G1 and G3, composed entirely of new images. We show that subprocess knowledge transferred between task phases, such that in a new task environment each group had enhanced accuracy in predicting subprocess dynamics they had experienced during prior learning. Computational models utilizing predictive representations, based solely on the temporal contiguity of experienced task states, without an ability to transfer knowledge, failed to explain these data. Instead, behavior was consistent with a predictive representation model that maps task states between prior and transfer learning. These results help advance a mechanistic understanding of how humans discover and abstract subprocesses composing their experiences and compositionally reuse prior knowledge as a scaffolding for new experiences.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 121(46)
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Google DeepMind (United Kingdom) (GB), Google (United Kingdom) (GB), University College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Algebra and Logic
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.