Modeling Drug Responses and Evolutionary Dynamics Using Patient-Derived Xenografts Reveals Precision Medicine Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

The intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancers, which is reflected in diverse drug responses, interplays with tumor evolution. In this study, we developed a preclinical experimental and analytical framework using patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDTX) from patients with treatment-naïve triple-negative breast cancers to test their predictive value in personalized cancer treatment approaches. Patients and their matched PDTXs exhibited concordant drug responses to neoadjuvant therapy using two trial designs and dosing schedules. This platform enabled analysis of nongenetic mechanisms involved in relapse dynamics. Treatment resulted in permanent phenotypic changes, with functional and therapeutic consequences. High-throughput drug screening methods in ex vivo PDTX cells revealed patient-specific drug response changes dependent on first-line therapy. This was validated in vivo, as exemplified by a change in olaparib sensitivity in tumors previously treated with clinically relevant cycles of standard-of-care chemotherapy. In summary, PDTXs provide a robust tool to test patient drug responses and therapeutic regimens and to model evolutionary trajectories. However, high intermodel variability and permanent nongenomic transcriptional changes constrain their use for personalized cancer therapy. This work highlights important considerations associated with preclinical drug response modeling and potential uses of the platform to identify efficacious and preferential sequential therapeutic regimens. Significance: Patient-derived tumor xenografts from treatment-naïve breast cancer samples can predict patient drug responses and model treatment-induced phenotypic and functional evolution, making them valuable preclinical tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Research
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-24-1703
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modeling Drug Responses and Evolutionary Dynamics Using Patient-Derived Xenografts Reveals Precision Medicine Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Oscar M. Rueda, Wendy Greenwood, Daniel Guerrero-Romero, Dimitra Georgopoulou et al.
3 citations
Cancer Research
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
0.70
article

Modeling Drug Responses and Evolutionary Dynamics Using Patient-Derived Xenografts Reveals Precision Medicine Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Oscar M. Rueda, Wendy Greenwood, Daniel Guerrero-Romero, Dimitra Georgopoulou, Jean Abraham, Louise Grybowicz, Abigail Shea, Martin O’Reilly, Jonny Lay, Sophia Wix, Agnese Giovannetti, Karen McAdam, Elham Esmaeilishirazifard, Helen Bardwell, Raquel Manzano García, Yaniv Lubling, Giulia Lerda, Maurizio Callari, Alistair Martin, A. Nagano, Riccardo Masina, Elena Provenzano, Alejandra Bruna, Steven Kupczak, Carlos Caldas, Justine Kane, Yi Cheng, Wei Cope, Lisa Young
article en
3 citations

Abstract

The intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity of triple-negative breast cancers, which is reflected in diverse drug responses, interplays with tumor evolution. In this study, we developed a preclinical experimental and analytical framework using patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDTX) from patients with treatment-naïve triple-negative breast cancers to test their predictive value in personalized cancer treatment approaches. Patients and their matched PDTXs exhibited concordant drug responses to neoadjuvant therapy using two trial designs and dosing schedules. This platform enabled analysis of nongenetic mechanisms involved in relapse dynamics. Treatment resulted in permanent phenotypic changes, with functional and therapeutic consequences. High-throughput drug screening methods in ex vivo PDTX cells revealed patient-specific drug response changes dependent on first-line therapy. This was validated in vivo, as exemplified by a change in olaparib sensitivity in tumors previously treated with clinically relevant cycles of standard-of-care chemotherapy. In summary, PDTXs provide a robust tool to test patient drug responses and therapeutic regimens and to model evolutionary trajectories. However, high intermodel variability and permanent nongenomic transcriptional changes constrain their use for personalized cancer therapy. This work highlights important considerations associated with preclinical drug response modeling and potential uses of the platform to identify efficacious and preferential sequential therapeutic regimens. Significance: Patient-derived tumor xenografts from treatment-naïve breast cancer samples can predict patient drug responses and model treatment-induced phenotypic and functional evolution, making them valuable preclinical tools.

Cancer ResearchVol. 85(3)
Institute of Cancer Research (GB), National Institute of Agricultural Botany (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Breast Cancer Now (GB), Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza (IT), Cancer Research UK (GB), Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center (GB), Fondazione Michelangelo (IT), Wellcome/MRC Institute of Metabolic Science (GB), MRC Biostatistics Unit (GB), Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Lancashire Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
U.S. Department of State, AstraZeneca, Cancer Research UK, National Institute for Health and Care Research, US-UK Fulbright Commission, University of Cambridge, European Commission, Cambridge University Hospitals, National Institutes of Health, Medical Research Council, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
0.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.