Evaluating Corporate Governance: Guiding Principles and Calls for Future Research

SYNOPSIS Prior research finds that companies’ evaluation of corporate governance is often piecemeal and symbolic, leaving companies vulnerable to systematic risks associated with governance failures. In this paper, we use interview data from 29 chief audit executives (CAEs) from publicly traded companies in the U.S. to propose guiding principles for how companies can formally evaluate their overall internal corporate governance systems. Our guiding principles can be adapted for a variety of governance-related objectives and leverage existing frameworks. We conclude by offering suggestions for future research. JEL Classifications: G34; M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Accounting Horizons
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/horizons-2023-082
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Risk Management in Financial Firms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.84
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Corporate Governance: Guiding Principles and Calls for Future Research

Christie Hayne, Terry L. Neal, Sarah E. Stein, Lauren M. Cunningham
3 citations
Accounting Horizons
Risk Management in Financial Firms
2.84
article

Evaluating Corporate Governance: Guiding Principles and Calls for Future Research

Christie Hayne, Terry L. Neal, Sarah E. Stein, Lauren M. Cunningham
article en
3 citations

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Prior research finds that companies’ evaluation of corporate governance is often piecemeal and symbolic, leaving companies vulnerable to systematic risks associated with governance failures. In this paper, we use interview data from 29 chief audit executives (CAEs) from publicly traded companies in the U.S. to propose guiding principles for how companies can formally evaluate their overall internal corporate governance systems. Our guiding principles can be adapted for a variety of governance-related objectives and leverage existing frameworks. We conclude by offering suggestions for future research. JEL Classifications: G34; M42.

Accounting HorizonsVol. 39(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Risk Management in Financial Firms
2.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.