The Political Economy of Knowledge: Navigating Scientometric Enthusiasm amidst Political and Economic Forces Shaping the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge

While we witness heightened enthusiasm in certain peripheral areas of scientific production regarding scientometric standards, there are increasingly pressing issues concerning how the ideal of objective and rational science is being called into question. In this article, I contrast the enthusiasm for the "prestige" of top-tier journals with the increasingly urgent problems related to the lack of independence of researchers and scientific research itself in a world dominated by security institutions and corporations. While many authors rush to blame postmodernists for the lack of trust in science, recent studies in the history of science reveal an increased role of security institutions and corporations in shaping what we call scientific truth. The ahistorical perspective of pure and objective scientific truth is rather an ideal, and enthusiasm for the scientometric apparatus measuring the quality and merits of scientific research is rather misplaced and tends to support a system where scientific knowledge is increasingly subservient to objectives other than the pursuit of truth.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Emancipations
Published
2024-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55533/2765-8414.1099
Primary Topic
Research, Science, and Academia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Political Economy of Knowledge: Navigating Scientometric Enthusiasm amidst Political and Economic Forces Shaping the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge

Maria Cernat
Emancipations
Research, Science, and Academia
article

The Political Economy of Knowledge: Navigating Scientometric Enthusiasm amidst Political and Economic Forces Shaping the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge

Maria Cernat
article en

Abstract

While we witness heightened enthusiasm in certain peripheral areas of scientific production regarding scientometric standards, there are increasingly pressing issues concerning how the ideal of objective and rational science is being called into question. In this article, I contrast the enthusiasm for the "prestige" of top-tier journals with the increasingly urgent problems related to the lack of independence of researchers and scientific research itself in a world dominated by security institutions and corporations. While many authors rush to blame postmodernists for the lack of trust in science, recent studies in the history of science reveal an increased role of security institutions and corporations in shaping what we call scientific truth. The ahistorical perspective of pure and objective scientific truth is rather an ideal, and enthusiasm for the scientometric apparatus measuring the quality and merits of scientific research is rather misplaced and tends to support a system where scientific knowledge is increasingly subservient to objectives other than the pursuit of truth.

Emancipations
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Research, Science, and Academia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.