Solar convective velocities: Updated helioseismic constraints

Modeling heat transport by convection is one of the most challenging aspects of solar and stellar physics. The literature currently provides apparently inconsistent observational estimates of the strength of large-scale convective flows in the upper layers of the solar convection zone. In addition, the large-scale convective flows predicted from numerical simulations are substantially stronger than some of the observational inferences in the literature. The current work aims to provide a consistent presentation of some of the main results in the literature both from observations and simulations. To achieve this aim, we carry out an analysis of published estimates of the strength of solar convection at different spatial scales. In particular, we employ a consistent set of conventions to compute the kinetic energy density in the east-west flows. This establishes a clear baseline for future work. The main conclusion is that there are inconsistencies between different observational results and also differences between observations and simulations. This conclusion is important as it demonstrates a need to determine the sources of the inconsistencies between different observational inferences and also to determine the missing ingredients in simulations of solar subsurface convection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0216728
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Solar convective velocities: Updated helioseismic constraints

Bradley W. Hindman, T. L. Duvall, A. C. Birch, Shravan Hanasoge et al.
8 citations
Physics of Fluids
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
2.65
article

Solar convective velocities: Updated helioseismic constraints

Bradley W. Hindman, T. L. Duvall, A. C. Birch, Shravan Hanasoge, Katepalli R. Sreenivasan, Bastian Proxauf, L. Gizon
article en
8 citations

Abstract

Modeling heat transport by convection is one of the most challenging aspects of solar and stellar physics. The literature currently provides apparently inconsistent observational estimates of the strength of large-scale convective flows in the upper layers of the solar convection zone. In addition, the large-scale convective flows predicted from numerical simulations are substantially stronger than some of the observational inferences in the literature. The current work aims to provide a consistent presentation of some of the main results in the literature both from observations and simulations. To achieve this aim, we carry out an analysis of published estimates of the strength of solar convection at different spatial scales. In particular, we employ a consistent set of conventions to compute the kinetic energy density in the east-west flows. This establishes a clear baseline for future work. The main conclusion is that there are inconsistencies between different observational results and also differences between observations and simulations. This conclusion is important as it demonstrates a need to determine the sources of the inconsistencies between different observational inferences and also to determine the missing ingredients in simulations of solar subsurface convection.

Physics of FluidsVol. 36(11)
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN), New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics (US), University of Colorado Boulder (US), Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences (US), Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (DE), New York University (US), University of Göttingen (DE), Stanford University (US)
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics
2.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.