Challenges and Opportunities for Tool Adoption in Industrial UX Research Collaborations

UX research practitioners analyze qualitative data to comprehend users' needs and synthesize design implications for software systems. Collaborating with multiple stakeholders is inevitable for these professionals and adds additional pressure to their already laborious data analysis tasks. In this paper, we investigate how these practitioners' multi-stakeholder collaboration affects their data analysis practices. Specifically, we investigate the challenges qualitative UX research (QUXR) practitioners face, limitations of the current qualitative data analysis (QDA) support tools they use, and design implications for future QDA tools to address the limitations. Through semi-structured interviews combined with diagramming activities with thirteen industry QUXR practitioners, we have revealed that collaboration becomes a bigger challenge than data analysis and that it often leads to (1) preferring simple tools despite the QDA specialized tools' beneficial features and (2) wanting to triangulate their work to convince stakeholders. Finally, we have synthesized these results and suggest design implications for QDA support tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Opportunities for Tool Adoption in Industrial UX Research Collaborations

Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Daye Kang
1 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
0.37
article

Challenges and Opportunities for Tool Adoption in Industrial UX Research Collaborations

Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Daye Kang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

UX research practitioners analyze qualitative data to comprehend users' needs and synthesize design implications for software systems. Collaborating with multiple stakeholders is inevitable for these professionals and adds additional pressure to their already laborious data analysis tasks. In this paper, we investigate how these practitioners' multi-stakeholder collaboration affects their data analysis practices. Specifically, we investigate the challenges qualitative UX research (QUXR) practitioners face, limitations of the current qualitative data analysis (QDA) support tools they use, and design implications for future QDA tools to address the limitations. Through semi-structured interviews combined with diagramming activities with thirteen industry QUXR practitioners, we have revealed that collaboration becomes a bigger challenge than data analysis and that it often leads to (1) preferring simple tools despite the QDA specialized tools' beneficial features and (2) wanting to triangulate their work to convince stakeholders. Finally, we have synthesized these results and suggest design implications for QDA support tools.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 8(CSCW2)
Cornell University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
0.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.