"You Can either Blame Technology or Blame a Person..." --- A Conceptual Model of Users' AI-Risk Perception as a Tool for HCI

AI-powered systems pose unknown challenges for designers, policymakers, and users, making it more difficult to assess potential harms and outcomes. Although understanding risks is a requirement for building trust in technology, users are often excluded from risk assessments and explanations in policy and design. To address this issue, we conducted three workshops with 18 participants and discussed the EU AI Act, which is the European proposal for a legal framework for AI regulation. Based on results of these workshops, we propose a user-centered conceptual model with five risk dimensions (Design and Development, Operational, Distributive, Individual, and Societal) that includes 17 key risks. We further identify six criteria for categorizing use cases. Our conceptual model (1) contributes to responsible design discourses by connecting the risk assessment theories with user-centered approaches, and (2) supports designers and policymakers in more strongly considering a user perspective that complements their own expert views.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686996
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"You Can either Blame Technology or Blame a Person..." --- A Conceptual Model of Users' AI-Risk Perception as a Tool for HCI

Alexander Boden, Veronika Krauß, Dennis Lawo, Dominik Pins et al.
4 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
article

"You Can either Blame Technology or Blame a Person..." --- A Conceptual Model of Users' AI-Risk Perception as a Tool for HCI

Alexander Boden, Veronika Krauß, Dennis Lawo, Dominik Pins, Lena Recki
article en
4 citations

Abstract

AI-powered systems pose unknown challenges for designers, policymakers, and users, making it more difficult to assess potential harms and outcomes. Although understanding risks is a requirement for building trust in technology, users are often excluded from risk assessments and explanations in policy and design. To address this issue, we conducted three workshops with 18 participants and discussed the EU AI Act, which is the European proposal for a legal framework for AI regulation. Based on results of these workshops, we propose a user-centered conceptual model with five risk dimensions (Design and Development, Operational, Distributive, Individual, and Societal) that includes 17 key risks. We further identify six criteria for categorizing use cases. Our conceptual model (1) contributes to responsible design discourses by connecting the risk assessment theories with user-centered approaches, and (2) supports designers and policymakers in more strongly considering a user perspective that complements their own expert views.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 8(CSCW2)
Hochschule Bonn-Rhein-Sieg (DE), University of Siegen (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.