Environmental assessment of gasification and green hydrogen potential role in waste management decarbonization

Achieving sustainability involves implementing a circular economy model and decarbonizing the waste management sector. The development of innovative technologies that enable the reduction of emissions and resource recovery is one of the sector's greatest challenges. From this perspective, the waste-to-methanol (WtM) process represents a viable prospect, the potential environmental impacts of which have never been studied from a life-cycle perspective. A cradle-to-grave LCA analysis was conducted, studying WtM technology and its potential implementation of green hydrogen (WtM-GH) in the process, through a comparison with traditional waste-to-energy (WtE). The results showed that WtM-GH performs best for global impacts, with a global warming potential of 3.52·10 7 kgCO 2eq instead of 1,04·10 8 kgCO 2eq proper of the WtE. Positive effects take place also for the fossil resource scarcity. Looking for non-toxic regional/local impacts WtE represents the best scenario, with the best performance on water consumption (7.96·10 7 m 3 ) and ionising radiation (2.82·10 7 kBq Co-60 eq ). Cumulative impact results, obtained through the normalization, found that WtM is the best scenario, thanks to the less toxic impact compared to the other two, especially for freshwater ecotoxicity (5.26·10 6 kg 1,4-DCB) and marine ecotoxicity (6.73·10 6 kg 1,4-DCB). WtM-GH allows the production of 1366 kg of methanol per ton of Refuse Derived Fuel, thanks to the conversion of the entire CO 2 contained in the waste, enhancing the value of by-products and carbon credits on the market and making the process more economically sustainable. • The waste-to-methanol process allows a reduction in global impacts, at the expense of regional/local impacts • The waste-to-energy process represents the best option for impacts on a regional scale • Green hydrogen use in waste-to-methanol leads to a notable reduction in global warming, allowing the potential utilization of CO 2 • The energy sources used are a key aspect of waste-to-methanol, whose performance is positive only in the case of low-carbon energy

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144174
Citations
31
Primary Topic
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental assessment of gasification and green hydrogen potential role in waste management decarbonization

Umberto Desideri, Ahmed M. Salem, Isabella Pecorini, Alessio Castagnoli
31 citations
Journal of Cleaner Production
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
9.09
article

Environmental assessment of gasification and green hydrogen potential role in waste management decarbonization

Umberto Desideri, Ahmed M. Salem, Isabella Pecorini, Alessio Castagnoli
article en
31 citations

Abstract

Achieving sustainability involves implementing a circular economy model and decarbonizing the waste management sector. The development of innovative technologies that enable the reduction of emissions and resource recovery is one of the sector's greatest challenges. From this perspective, the waste-to-methanol (WtM) process represents a viable prospect, the potential environmental impacts of which have never been studied from a life-cycle perspective. A cradle-to-grave LCA analysis was conducted, studying WtM technology and its potential implementation of green hydrogen (WtM-GH) in the process, through a comparison with traditional waste-to-energy (WtE). The results showed that WtM-GH performs best for global impacts, with a global warming potential of 3.52·10 7 kgCO 2eq instead of 1,04·10 8 kgCO 2eq proper of the WtE. Positive effects take place also for the fossil resource scarcity. Looking for non-toxic regional/local impacts WtE represents the best scenario, with the best performance on water consumption (7.96·10 7 m 3 ) and ionising radiation (2.82·10 7 kBq Co-60 eq ). Cumulative impact results, obtained through the normalization, found that WtM is the best scenario, thanks to the less toxic impact compared to the other two, especially for freshwater ecotoxicity (5.26·10 6 kg 1,4-DCB) and marine ecotoxicity (6.73·10 6 kg 1,4-DCB). WtM-GH allows the production of 1366 kg of methanol per ton of Refuse Derived Fuel, thanks to the conversion of the entire CO 2 contained in the waste, enhancing the value of by-products and carbon credits on the market and making the process more economically sustainable. • The waste-to-methanol process allows a reduction in global impacts, at the expense of regional/local impacts • The waste-to-energy process represents the best option for impacts on a regional scale • Green hydrogen use in waste-to-methanol leads to a notable reduction in global warming, allowing the potential utilization of CO 2 • The energy sources used are a key aspect of waste-to-methanol, whose performance is positive only in the case of low-carbon energy

Journal of Cleaner ProductionVol. 482
University of Pisa (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
9.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.