"Something Fast and Cheap" or "A Core Element of Building Trust"? - AI Auditing Professionals' Perspectives on Trust in AI

Artificial Intelligence (AI) auditing is a relatively new area of work. Currently, there is a lack of uniform standards and regulation. As a result, the AI auditing ecosystem is very diverse, and AI auditing professionals use a variety of different auditing methods. So far, little is known about how AI auditors approach the concept of trust in AI through AI audits, in particular regarding the trust of users. This paper reports findings from interviews with 19 AI auditing stakeholders to understand how AI auditing professionals seek to create calibrated trust in AI tools and AI audits. Themes identified included the AI auditing ecosystem, participants' experiences with AI auditing, and trust in AI audits and AI. The paper adds to the existing research on trust in AI and trustworthiness in AI by adding perspectives of key stakeholders regarding trust in AI Audits by users as an essential and currently less explored part of the trust in AI research. This paper shows how information asymmetry in respect to AI audits can decrease the value of audits for users and consequently their trust in AI systems. Study participants suggest key elements for rebuilding trust and suggest recommendations for the AI auditing industry, such as monitoring of auditors and effective communication about AI audits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3686963
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"Something Fast and Cheap" or "A Core Element of Building Trust"? - AI Auditing Professionals' Perspectives on Trust in AI

Tina Lassiter, Kenneth R. Fleischmann
11 citations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
article

"Something Fast and Cheap" or "A Core Element of Building Trust"? - AI Auditing Professionals' Perspectives on Trust in AI

Tina Lassiter, Kenneth R. Fleischmann
article en
11 citations

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) auditing is a relatively new area of work. Currently, there is a lack of uniform standards and regulation. As a result, the AI auditing ecosystem is very diverse, and AI auditing professionals use a variety of different auditing methods. So far, little is known about how AI auditors approach the concept of trust in AI through AI audits, in particular regarding the trust of users. This paper reports findings from interviews with 19 AI auditing stakeholders to understand how AI auditing professionals seek to create calibrated trust in AI tools and AI audits. Themes identified included the AI auditing ecosystem, participants' experiences with AI auditing, and trust in AI audits and AI. The paper adds to the existing research on trust in AI and trustworthiness in AI by adding perspectives of key stakeholders regarding trust in AI Audits by users as an essential and currently less explored part of the trust in AI research. This paper shows how information asymmetry in respect to AI audits can decrease the value of audits for users and consequently their trust in AI systems. Study participants suggest key elements for rebuilding trust and suggest recommendations for the AI auditing industry, such as monitoring of auditors and effective communication about AI audits.

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer InteractionVol. 8(CSCW2)
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
5.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.