Performance of energy ETFs and climate risks

We investigate whether green (brown) portfolios constructed from clean energy ETFs (fossil fuel ETFs) yield positive (negative) returns conditional on climate-related risks. While the green portfolios do not unconditionally outperform the brown ones, the outperformance of green portfolios is statistically significant under the conditional setting using non-parametric estimates with imposing inequality restrictions. Our conditional studies also show that brown portfolios are riskier than green ones with various measurements. We present the heterogeneity in the effect of climate information on the return and risk of green and brown portfolios. Furthermore, we document that fund flows for green assets are higher than those for brown ones during periods of high climate risks. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications. • We study return performances and risks of energy portfolios under the conditional setting. • We demonstrate opposite results compared to unconditional studies which are used in existing literature. • Specifically, we report that the green portfolio outperforms the brown one; the brown portfolio is risker than the green one, in particular, the brown portfolio has higher downside market semibeta, which are not found if relying on unconditional tests. • We find that fund flows of green assets are higher than that for brown ones. • Our results are robust to economic cycles and alternative specifications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Economics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.108031
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.90

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance of energy ETFs and climate risks

Minh Nhat Nguyen, Ruipeng Liu, Youwei Li
7 citations
Energy Economics
Market Dynamics and Volatility
7.90
article

Performance of energy ETFs and climate risks

Minh Nhat Nguyen, Ruipeng Liu, Youwei Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We investigate whether green (brown) portfolios constructed from clean energy ETFs (fossil fuel ETFs) yield positive (negative) returns conditional on climate-related risks. While the green portfolios do not unconditionally outperform the brown ones, the outperformance of green portfolios is statistically significant under the conditional setting using non-parametric estimates with imposing inequality restrictions. Our conditional studies also show that brown portfolios are riskier than green ones with various measurements. We present the heterogeneity in the effect of climate information on the return and risk of green and brown portfolios. Furthermore, we document that fund flows for green assets are higher than those for brown ones during periods of high climate risks. Our findings are robust to alternative specifications. • We study return performances and risks of energy portfolios under the conditional setting. • We demonstrate opposite results compared to unconditional studies which are used in existing literature. • Specifically, we report that the green portfolio outperforms the brown one; the brown portfolio is risker than the green one, in particular, the brown portfolio has higher downside market semibeta, which are not found if relying on unconditional tests. • We find that fund flows of green assets are higher than that for brown ones. • Our results are robust to economic cycles and alternative specifications.

Energy EconomicsVol. 141
Deakin University (AU), University of Hull (GB)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
7.90
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.