Review of nonflow estimation methods and uncertainties in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Abstract Collective anisotropic flow, where particles are correlated over the entire event, is a prominent phenomenon in relativistic heavy-ion collisions and is sensitive to the properties of the matter created in those collisions. It is often measured by two- and multi-particle correlations and is therefore contaminated by nonflow, those genuine few-body correlations unrelated to the global event-wise correlations. Many methods have been devised to estimate nonflow contamination with various degrees of successes and difficulties. Here, we review those methods pedagogically, discussing the pros and cons of each method, and give examples of ballpark estimate of nonflow contamination and associated uncertainties in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We hope such a review of the various nonflow estimation methods in a single place would prove helpful to future researches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6471/ad903b
Citations
5
Primary Topic
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of nonflow estimation methods and uncertainties in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Y. Feng, F. Wang
5 citations
Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
3.30
article

Review of nonflow estimation methods and uncertainties in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Y. Feng, F. Wang
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Collective anisotropic flow, where particles are correlated over the entire event, is a prominent phenomenon in relativistic heavy-ion collisions and is sensitive to the properties of the matter created in those collisions. It is often measured by two- and multi-particle correlations and is therefore contaminated by nonflow, those genuine few-body correlations unrelated to the global event-wise correlations. Many methods have been devised to estimate nonflow contamination with various degrees of successes and difficulties. Here, we review those methods pedagogically, discussing the pros and cons of each method, and give examples of ballpark estimate of nonflow contamination and associated uncertainties in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. We hope such a review of the various nonflow estimation methods in a single place would prove helpful to future researches.

Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle PhysicsVol. 52(1)
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
U.S. Department of Energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
High-Energy Particle Collisions Research
3.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.