Web-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adults living with cancer: A single case experimental design (SCED)

A randomised multiple-baseline design assessed the preliminary efficacy of a low-intensity, minimally-guided, online, self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for people affected by cancer on quality of life (QoL), psychological symptoms, psychological flexibility, and level of interference from pain and fatigue. Acceptability and feasibility was also assessed. Adult participants (n = 7) had either completed cancer treatment within the last 18 months or were currently receiving treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to a baseline length of 1-3 weeks prior to completing the six-week ACT intervention, followed by a one-month follow-up. At pre- and post-intervention, and one-month follow-up, cancer-specific QoL, psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression), and psychological flexibility were assessed using standardised questionnaires. Single-item daily ratings of mood, anxiety, psychological flexibility, and bother ratings of pain and fatigue were also assessed. Questionnaire data were analysed using reliable and clinically significant change. Daily measures were analysed using visual and Tau-U analysis. Participants reported less negative impact of cancer on QoL (n = 3: CancerDQoL), fewer depressive symptoms (n=5: HADS depression) and greater psychological flexibility (n=3: MPFI) at follow-up. Daily measures showed improvements in self-reported mood (n=3), anxiety (n=3) and psychological flexibility (n=5) across different phase comparisons. Most participants (n=5) were significantly less bothered by fatigue at follow-up, and two were significantly less bothered by pain. Feedback from participants supported the acceptability of the intervention. The results provide preliminary support for the efficacy of the ACT intervention in reducing the negative impact of cancer on QoL, and improving self-reported psychological outcomes and psychological flexibility. Longitudinal studies utilising a larger sample are warranted. • A low intensity online ACT intervention was acceptable to adults with cancer. • The negative impact of cancer on QoL was reduced reliably for 57% of participants. • Symptoms of depression were reduced reliably for 71% of participants. • Most participants (71%) were less bothered by fatigue. • Psychological flexibility improved reliably for 57% of participants. • A clinical trial with longer follow-up is needed to replicate the findings in a large sample.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2024.100849
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Web-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adults living with cancer: A single case experimental design (SCED)

H. Taylor, Michelle Taylor, Jessica L. Kingston
3 citations
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
1.92
article

Web-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for adults living with cancer: A single case experimental design (SCED)

H. Taylor, Michelle Taylor, Jessica L. Kingston
article en
3 citations

Abstract

A randomised multiple-baseline design assessed the preliminary efficacy of a low-intensity, minimally-guided, online, self-help Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) intervention for people affected by cancer on quality of life (QoL), psychological symptoms, psychological flexibility, and level of interference from pain and fatigue. Acceptability and feasibility was also assessed. Adult participants (n = 7) had either completed cancer treatment within the last 18 months or were currently receiving treatment. Participants were randomly assigned to a baseline length of 1-3 weeks prior to completing the six-week ACT intervention, followed by a one-month follow-up. At pre- and post-intervention, and one-month follow-up, cancer-specific QoL, psychological symptoms (anxiety and depression), and psychological flexibility were assessed using standardised questionnaires. Single-item daily ratings of mood, anxiety, psychological flexibility, and bother ratings of pain and fatigue were also assessed. Questionnaire data were analysed using reliable and clinically significant change. Daily measures were analysed using visual and Tau-U analysis. Participants reported less negative impact of cancer on QoL (n = 3: CancerDQoL), fewer depressive symptoms (n=5: HADS depression) and greater psychological flexibility (n=3: MPFI) at follow-up. Daily measures showed improvements in self-reported mood (n=3), anxiety (n=3) and psychological flexibility (n=5) across different phase comparisons. Most participants (n=5) were significantly less bothered by fatigue at follow-up, and two were significantly less bothered by pain. Feedback from participants supported the acceptability of the intervention. The results provide preliminary support for the efficacy of the ACT intervention in reducing the negative impact of cancer on QoL, and improving self-reported psychological outcomes and psychological flexibility. Longitudinal studies utilising a larger sample are warranted. • A low intensity online ACT intervention was acceptable to adults with cancer. • The negative impact of cancer on QoL was reduced reliably for 57% of participants. • Symptoms of depression were reduced reliably for 71% of participants. • Most participants (71%) were less bothered by fatigue. • Psychological flexibility improved reliably for 57% of participants. • A clinical trial with longer follow-up is needed to replicate the findings in a large sample.

Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceVol. 34
CAB International (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
1.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.