Superimposing Ligands with a Ligand Overlay as an Alternate Topology Model for λ-Dynamics-Based Calculations

Alchemical free energy (AFE) calculations can predict binding affinity changes as a function of structural modifications and have become powerful tools for lead optimization and drug discovery. Central to the setup and performance of AFE calculations is the manner of mapping alchemical transformations, known as the topology model. Single, dual, and hybrid topology models have been used with various AFE methods in the field. In recent works, λ-dynamics (λD) free energy calculations, specifically, have preferred the use of a hybrid multiple topology (HMT) for sampling multiple ligand perturbations. In this work, we evaluate a new topology method called ligand overlay (LO) for use with λD-based calculations, including the recently introduced λ-dynamics with a bias-updated Gibbs sampling (LaDyBUGS) approach. LO is a full multiple topology model that allows entire ligands to be sampled and restrained within a λ-dynamics framework. Relative binding free energies were computed with HMT or LO topology models with LaDyBUGS for 45 ligands across five protein benchmark systems. An overall Pearson <i>R</i> correlation of 0.98 and mean unsigned error of 0.32 kcal/mol were observed, suggesting that LO is a viable alternative topology model for λD-based calculations. We discuss the merits of using an HMT or LO model for future ligand studies with λD or LaDyBUGS calculations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04805
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superimposing Ligands with a Ligand Overlay as an Alternate Topology Model for λ-Dynamics-Based Calculations

Jonah Z. Vilseck, Michael P. Liesen
5 citations
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
1.20
article

Superimposing Ligands with a Ligand Overlay as an Alternate Topology Model for λ-Dynamics-Based Calculations

Jonah Z. Vilseck, Michael P. Liesen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Alchemical free energy (AFE) calculations can predict binding affinity changes as a function of structural modifications and have become powerful tools for lead optimization and drug discovery. Central to the setup and performance of AFE calculations is the manner of mapping alchemical transformations, known as the topology model. Single, dual, and hybrid topology models have been used with various AFE methods in the field. In recent works, λ-dynamics (λD) free energy calculations, specifically, have preferred the use of a hybrid multiple topology (HMT) for sampling multiple ligand perturbations. In this work, we evaluate a new topology method called ligand overlay (LO) for use with λD-based calculations, including the recently introduced λ-dynamics with a bias-updated Gibbs sampling (LaDyBUGS) approach. LO is a full multiple topology model that allows entire ligands to be sampled and restrained within a λ-dynamics framework. Relative binding free energies were computed with HMT or LO topology models with LaDyBUGS for 45 ligands across five protein benchmark systems. An overall Pearson <i>R</i> correlation of 0.98 and mean unsigned error of 0.32 kcal/mol were observed, suggesting that LO is a viable alternative topology model for λD-based calculations. We discuss the merits of using an HMT or LO model for future ligand studies with λD or LaDyBUGS calculations.

The Journal of Physical Chemistry BVol. 128(46)
Institute of Bioinformatics (IN), University School (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Indiana University (US)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.