Performance assessment of public transport networks: An AHP-ANP approach

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been extensively employed by researchers in the public transport (PT) sector. While many studies utilize a single MCDM method, employing multiple MCDM methods can achieve more robust results. Furthermore, integrated MCDM methods have the potential to address the weaknesses and limitations inherent in single MCDM method. In this study, we address the limitations of single MCDM methods by integrating the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the analytic network process (ANP) to evaluate public transport networks performance. Based on the established public transport criteria matrix AHP model, we identify interdependencies among criteria. The AHP-ANP method is then applied to assess public transport networks in three case study cities in Australia. The sensitivity analysis conducted on both the AHP and integrated AHP-ANP approaches highlights the influence of criteria interdependency. This research contributes to mitigating the limitations of AHP method and applies AHP-ANP model to provide decision-makers with insights to enhance PT network performance and achieve smart PT network management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40309
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance assessment of public transport networks: An AHP-ANP approach

Gang Lin, Honglei Xu, Qiuyi Zhang, Yiqun Zhang et al.
7 citations
Heliyon
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
3.43
article

Performance assessment of public transport networks: An AHP-ANP approach

Gang Lin, Honglei Xu, Qiuyi Zhang, Yiqun Zhang, Shaoli Wang
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been extensively employed by researchers in the public transport (PT) sector. While many studies utilize a single MCDM method, employing multiple MCDM methods can achieve more robust results. Furthermore, integrated MCDM methods have the potential to address the weaknesses and limitations inherent in single MCDM method. In this study, we address the limitations of single MCDM methods by integrating the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with the analytic network process (ANP) to evaluate public transport networks performance. Based on the established public transport criteria matrix AHP model, we identify interdependencies among criteria. The AHP-ANP method is then applied to assess public transport networks in three case study cities in Australia. The sensitivity analysis conducted on both the AHP and integrated AHP-ANP approaches highlights the influence of criteria interdependency. This research contributes to mitigating the limitations of AHP method and applies AHP-ANP model to provide decision-makers with insights to enhance PT network performance and achieve smart PT network management.

HeliyonVol. 10(22)
Curtin University (AU), Sophia University (JP), Fujian University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Multi-Criteria Decision Making
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.