Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives

Textbook research has long been a critical area within the educational academic community. With the ongoing spread of globalization, the significance of educational globalization has become increasingly apparent. Comparative analyses of textbooks from different countries have thus emerged as a popular and critical research topic. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in cross-cultural textbook studies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of global disparities in this field. This study compiles essential findings from both domestic and international textbook research, aiming to uncover differences and trends. Using CiteSpace software (V.6.2.R4), a comprehensive visual analysis was conducted through bibliometric and knowledge graph methods, comparing Chinese and international textbook research over the past decade (2013–2023). This paper presents an intuitive visual map of the key dynamics in textbook research. Utilizing a quantitative approach, this study analyzed 1644 and 1478 relevant articles from the Web of Science (WoS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, respectively. It examined the annual distribution, core contributors, and institutional co-occurrence of textbook research from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023, identifying the distinctive characteristics of textbook research both in China and internationally. Additionally, CiteSpace’s built-in algorithm was used to extract keywords and highlight primary research areas, while keyword burst detection was utilized to illustrate developmental trends. The analysis revealed key differences between Chinese and international textbook research in terms of research focus, organizational forms, focal areas, and future development trends. This study also discusses potential future directions in this area, such as establishing a systematic framework for textbook research, fostering a global community of textbook scholars, and integrating localized elements into textbook research. Additionally, it highlights the importance of sustainability in textbook research, emphasizing the need for educational materials that support long-term global educational goals.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2024-11-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16229731
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Educational Research and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives

Xuanyi Qu, Xuyuan Chen
1 citations
Sustainability
Educational Research and Analysis
2.10
article

Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives

Xuanyi Qu, Xuyuan Chen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Textbook research has long been a critical area within the educational academic community. With the ongoing spread of globalization, the significance of educational globalization has become increasingly apparent. Comparative analyses of textbooks from different countries have thus emerged as a popular and critical research topic. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in cross-cultural textbook studies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of global disparities in this field. This study compiles essential findings from both domestic and international textbook research, aiming to uncover differences and trends. Using CiteSpace software (V.6.2.R4), a comprehensive visual analysis was conducted through bibliometric and knowledge graph methods, comparing Chinese and international textbook research over the past decade (2013–2023). This paper presents an intuitive visual map of the key dynamics in textbook research. Utilizing a quantitative approach, this study analyzed 1644 and 1478 relevant articles from the Web of Science (WoS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, respectively. It examined the annual distribution, core contributors, and institutional co-occurrence of textbook research from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023, identifying the distinctive characteristics of textbook research both in China and internationally. Additionally, CiteSpace’s built-in algorithm was used to extract keywords and highlight primary research areas, while keyword burst detection was utilized to illustrate developmental trends. The analysis revealed key differences between Chinese and international textbook research in terms of research focus, organizational forms, focal areas, and future development trends. This study also discusses potential future directions in this area, such as establishing a systematic framework for textbook research, fostering a global community of textbook scholars, and integrating localized elements into textbook research. Additionally, it highlights the importance of sustainability in textbook research, emphasizing the need for educational materials that support long-term global educational goals.

SustainabilityVol. 16(22)
Northeast Normal University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Educational Research and Analysis
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.