Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks: a case study in Mariana/MG, Brazil

The landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) plays an important role in risk management. This study evaluated the predictive capabilities of three machine learning (ML) approaches applied to LSM: logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), and artificial neural networks (ANN). The study was conducted in a mountainous region of Mariana/MG, Brazil. Initially, a point inventory with 364 landslides and 364 stable regions was randomly partitioned in a 70% training and 30% testing ratio for the models. Nine landslide conditioning factors (LCF), ranked by information gain (IG), were considered: slope angle (IG=0.486), geomorphology (IG=0.235), topographic wetness index - TWI (IG=0.138), lithology (IG=0.077), slope orientation (IG=0.067), topographic position index - TPI (IG=0.052), distance from drainage (IG=0.032), slope curvature (IG=0.029) and the distance from roads (IG=0.024). The evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC-ROC) and the classification efficiency rates in high () and low () susceptibility were used to compare the results of the approaches. The results demonstrated that although RF (AUC-ROC=0,947, =6,808, =0,030) slightly outperformed LR (AUC-ROC=0,936, =5,695, =0,050) and ANN (AUC-ROC=0,934, =6,495, =0,060), all the approaches exhibited high predictive capability in identifying areas susceptible to landslides.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Brasileira de Geomorfologia
Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20502/rbgeomorfologia.v25i4.2584
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks: a case study in Mariana/MG, Brazil

César Falcão Barella, Mateus Oliveira Xavier
1 citations
Revista Brasileira de Geomorfologia
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
article

Landslide susceptibility mapping using logistic regression, random forests, and artificial neural networks: a case study in Mariana/MG, Brazil

César Falcão Barella, Mateus Oliveira Xavier
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) plays an important role in risk management. This study evaluated the predictive capabilities of three machine learning (ML) approaches applied to LSM: logistic regression (LR), random forests (RF), and artificial neural networks (ANN). The study was conducted in a mountainous region of Mariana/MG, Brazil. Initially, a point inventory with 364 landslides and 364 stable regions was randomly partitioned in a 70% training and 30% testing ratio for the models. Nine landslide conditioning factors (LCF), ranked by information gain (IG), were considered: slope angle (IG=0.486), geomorphology (IG=0.235), topographic wetness index - TWI (IG=0.138), lithology (IG=0.077), slope orientation (IG=0.067), topographic position index - TPI (IG=0.052), distance from drainage (IG=0.032), slope curvature (IG=0.029) and the distance from roads (IG=0.024). The evaluation of the area under the curve (AUC-ROC) and the classification efficiency rates in high () and low () susceptibility were used to compare the results of the approaches. The results demonstrated that although RF (AUC-ROC=0,947, =6,808, =0,030) slightly outperformed LR (AUC-ROC=0,936, =5,695, =0,050) and ANN (AUC-ROC=0,934, =6,495, =0,060), all the approaches exhibited high predictive capability in identifying areas susceptible to landslides.

Revista Brasileira de GeomorfologiaVol. 25(4)
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto (BR)
Australian Government, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Governo Brasil, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Landslides and related hazards
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.