Classifying modified gravity and dark energy theories with Bayesian neural networks: massive neutrinos, baryonic feedback, and the theoretical error

ABSTRACT We study the capacity of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) to detect new physics in the dark matter power spectrum. As in previous studies, the Bayesian Cosmological Network (bacon) classifies spectra into one of five classes: $\Lambda$CDM, $f(R)$, $w$CDM, Dvali–Gabadaze–Porrati (DGP) gravity, and a ‘random’ class, with this work extending it to include the effects of massive neutrinos and baryonic feedback. We further develop the treatment of theoretical errors in bacon-ii, investigating several approaches and identifying the one that best allows the trained network to generalize to other power spectrum modelling prescriptions. In particular, we compare power spectra data produced by euclidemulator2, hmcode, and halofit, all supplemented with the halo model reaction to model beyond-$\Lambda$CDM physics. We investigate BNN classifiers trained on these sets of spectra, adding in Stage-IV survey noise and various theoretical error models. Using our optimal theoretical error model, our fiducial classifier achieves a total classification accuracy of $\sim$95 per cent when it is trained on euclidemulator2-based spectra with modification parameters drawn from a Gaussian distribution centred around $\Lambda$CDM ($f(R)$: $\sigma _{fR0} = 10^{-5.5}$, DGP: $\sigma _{r\mathrm{c}} = 0.173$, $w$CDM: $\sigma _{w0} = 0.097$, $\sigma _{wa}=0.32$). This strengthens the promise of this method to glean the maximal amount of unbiased gravitational and cosmological information from forthcoming Stage-IV galaxy surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2500
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Classifying modified gravity and dark energy theories with Bayesian neural networks: massive neutrinos, baryonic feedback, and the theoretical error

Linus Thummel, Lucas Lombriser, Alkistis Pourtsidou, Benjamin Bose
2 citations
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Computational Physics and Python Applications
0.69
article

Classifying modified gravity and dark energy theories with Bayesian neural networks: massive neutrinos, baryonic feedback, and the theoretical error

Linus Thummel, Lucas Lombriser, Alkistis Pourtsidou, Benjamin Bose
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT We study the capacity of Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) to detect new physics in the dark matter power spectrum. As in previous studies, the Bayesian Cosmological Network (bacon) classifies spectra into one of five classes: $\Lambda$CDM, $f(R)$, $w$CDM, Dvali–Gabadaze–Porrati (DGP) gravity, and a ‘random’ class, with this work extending it to include the effects of massive neutrinos and baryonic feedback. We further develop the treatment of theoretical errors in bacon-ii, investigating several approaches and identifying the one that best allows the trained network to generalize to other power spectrum modelling prescriptions. In particular, we compare power spectra data produced by euclidemulator2, hmcode, and halofit, all supplemented with the halo model reaction to model beyond-$\Lambda$CDM physics. We investigate BNN classifiers trained on these sets of spectra, adding in Stage-IV survey noise and various theoretical error models. Using our optimal theoretical error model, our fiducial classifier achieves a total classification accuracy of $\sim$95 per cent when it is trained on euclidemulator2-based spectra with modification parameters drawn from a Gaussian distribution centred around $\Lambda$CDM ($f(R)$: $\sigma _{fR0} = 10^{-5.5}$, DGP: $\sigma _{r\mathrm{c}} = 0.173$, $w$CDM: $\sigma _{w0} = 0.097$, $\sigma _{wa}=0.32$). This strengthens the promise of this method to glean the maximal amount of unbiased gravitational and cosmological information from forthcoming Stage-IV galaxy surveys.

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyVol. 535(4)
University of Geneva (CH), Royal Observatory (GB), Maxwell Institute for Mathematical Sciences (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Science and Technology Facilities Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Computational Physics and Python Applications
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.