Beyond the Face: Double-Sided Renaissance Portraits and the Craft of Thought

Abstract This essay investigates how touching and handling Renaissance portraits could serve as a memory technique. It analyses three paintings that solicited physical interaction: Giovanni Bellini’s Portrait of Giovanni Andrea Probi (once the lid of a chest); and two double-sided panels, Previtali’s Portrait of a Man; and Boltraffio’s Portrait of Girolamo Casio. The notion that memory resided in a (physical or symbolic) place in the back of the head was widespread in sixteenth-century Italy, and the backsides of double-sided portraits can be identified with such memory spaces. By bringing the portraits into dialogue with sixteenth-century texts on memory and art theory, I argue that they reflect the idea that memory and painting were sister arts. Critically adding to Carruthers’s notion of the craft of thought, I interpret the beholder’s physical interaction with portraits as a technique for shaping thoughts, making associations and forging links between beholders and portraits through the moving body.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Art History
Published
2024-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arthis/ulae047
Primary Topic
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Face: Double-Sided Renaissance Portraits and the Craft of Thought

Clim Wijnands
Art History
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
article

Beyond the Face: Double-Sided Renaissance Portraits and the Craft of Thought

Clim Wijnands
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay investigates how touching and handling Renaissance portraits could serve as a memory technique. It analyses three paintings that solicited physical interaction: Giovanni Bellini’s Portrait of Giovanni Andrea Probi (once the lid of a chest); and two double-sided panels, Previtali’s Portrait of a Man; and Boltraffio’s Portrait of Girolamo Casio. The notion that memory resided in a (physical or symbolic) place in the back of the head was widespread in sixteenth-century Italy, and the backsides of double-sided portraits can be identified with such memory spaces. By bringing the portraits into dialogue with sixteenth-century texts on memory and art theory, I argue that they reflect the idea that memory and painting were sister arts. Critically adding to Carruthers’s notion of the craft of thought, I interpret the beholder’s physical interaction with portraits as a technique for shaping thoughts, making associations and forging links between beholders and portraits through the moving body.

Art HistoryVol. 47(5)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.