Habermas Contra Lyotard: The Question of Modernity

This paper will explore the discourse between Jürgen Habermas and Jean-François Lyotard regarding their interpretations of modernity. Both philosophers are significant figures in contemporary thought. Habermas is recognized as a leading critical theorist, while Lyotard is identified as a prominent postmodernist. Despite their differing philosophical frameworks, both acknowledged the increasing complexity of society. In their exchange, Habermas advocated for the concept of universal emancipation, viewing modernity as an ongoing endeavor. Conversely, Lyotard outright dismissed this notion, arguing that Habermas's perspective represents yet another grand narrative that has lost its validity in the context of postmodernity. Consequently, this paper will analyze the positions of both philosophers, focusing on Habermas's critique of Lyotard's postmodernism in relation to modernity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Ecohumanism
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i7.4635
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Postmodernism in Literature and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.91
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Habermas Contra Lyotard: The Question of Modernity

Ramze Endut
1 citations
Journal of Ecohumanism
Postmodernism in Literature and Education
3.91
article

Habermas Contra Lyotard: The Question of Modernity

Ramze Endut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper will explore the discourse between Jürgen Habermas and Jean-François Lyotard regarding their interpretations of modernity. Both philosophers are significant figures in contemporary thought. Habermas is recognized as a leading critical theorist, while Lyotard is identified as a prominent postmodernist. Despite their differing philosophical frameworks, both acknowledged the increasing complexity of society. In their exchange, Habermas advocated for the concept of universal emancipation, viewing modernity as an ongoing endeavor. Conversely, Lyotard outright dismissed this notion, arguing that Habermas's perspective represents yet another grand narrative that has lost its validity in the context of postmodernity. Consequently, this paper will analyze the positions of both philosophers, focusing on Habermas's critique of Lyotard's postmodernism in relation to modernity.

Journal of EcohumanismVol. 3(7)
National University of Malaysia (MY)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Postmodernism in Literature and Education
3.91
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.