Assessing Error upon Sampling Bagged Animal Feed

The University of Kentucky Division of Regulatory Services explored the adequacy of the AOAC Official Method 965.16 for sampling bagged animal feed and assessed the acceptability of the sample error introduced through the sampling process. Eight feedstuffs were selected to represent a variety of feed forms, and their inherent differences in component size, with the objective of estimating the acceptability of the error introduced in the sampling process for each analyte. The findings suggest that the AOAC Official Method 965.16 is suitable for use in the collection of samples for regulatory purposes, particularly concerning mineral and drug components. The study's analysis and methodology provide valuable insights into the adequacy of the sampling method for regulatory purposes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regulatory Science
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs.regsci.121293
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.34
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Error upon Sampling Bagged Animal Feed

F. J. Sikora, Jennifer C. Combs, Gunyon M. Harrison
1 citations
Journal of Regulatory Science
Meat and Animal Product Quality
0.34
article

Assessing Error upon Sampling Bagged Animal Feed

F. J. Sikora, Jennifer C. Combs, Gunyon M. Harrison
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The University of Kentucky Division of Regulatory Services explored the adequacy of the AOAC Official Method 965.16 for sampling bagged animal feed and assessed the acceptability of the sample error introduced through the sampling process. Eight feedstuffs were selected to represent a variety of feed forms, and their inherent differences in component size, with the objective of estimating the acceptability of the error introduced in the sampling process for each analyte. The findings suggest that the AOAC Official Method 965.16 is suitable for use in the collection of samples for regulatory purposes, particularly concerning mineral and drug components. The study's analysis and methodology provide valuable insights into the adequacy of the sampling method for regulatory purposes.

Journal of Regulatory ScienceVol. 12(1)
University of Kentucky (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
0.34
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.