Nutritional quality of proteins from two beef co-products as determined in the growing pig

The increasing demand for food and especially proteins leads to the search for alternative protein sources. Meat co-products, which are available but little used in human food, provide a potential solution to this challenge. The present study aimed to evaluate the nutritional quality of two beef protein ingredients (greasy greaves recovered proteins (GGRP) and water recovered proteins (WRP)), both co-products of the fat rendering process. Their true ileal digestibility (TID), digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and kinetics of plasma amino acids (AA) were measured in ten growing pigs, each fed the two co-products and a protein-free diet. Titanium dioxide was used as an indigestible marker. Digesta samples were collected for 9 h after meal ingestion, and blood samples were collected at ten time points during the same period. Total nitrogen (N) and AA contents were determined. Data were statistically analysed using linear mixed models. The TID of total N was not different between WRP and GGRP (81-84 %, <i>P</i> > 0·05). The first-limiting AA was Trp for both ingredients, with a DIAAS much higher for GGRP than for WRP (74 and 10 % for adults, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0·001). Postprandial plasma AA concentration peaked earlier for WRP (3 h) than for GGRP (5 h). Plasma concentrations of total and essential AA were higher (<i>P</i> < 0·001) with GGRP diet than WRP diet. Overall, GGRP has a nutritional quality suitable to meet the needs of adults for AA, while WRP needs to be supplemented with other protein sources to fulfil the dietary requirements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal Of Nutrition
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114524001661
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nutritional quality of proteins from two beef co-products as determined in the growing pig

Pascaline Hamon, Séverine Chevalier, Rozenn Le Foll, Amélie Deglaire et al.
British Journal Of Nutrition
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Nutritional quality of proteins from two beef co-products as determined in the growing pig

Pascaline Hamon, Séverine Chevalier, Rozenn Le Foll, Amélie Deglaire, Valérie Lechevalier-Datin, Xavier Lambert, Françoise Nau, Gwénaële Henry, Yann Le Gouar, Catherine Guérin‐Dubiard, Arlette Leduc
article en

Abstract

The increasing demand for food and especially proteins leads to the search for alternative protein sources. Meat co-products, which are available but little used in human food, provide a potential solution to this challenge. The present study aimed to evaluate the nutritional quality of two beef protein ingredients (greasy greaves recovered proteins (GGRP) and water recovered proteins (WRP)), both co-products of the fat rendering process. Their true ileal digestibility (TID), digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS) and kinetics of plasma amino acids (AA) were measured in ten growing pigs, each fed the two co-products and a protein-free diet. Titanium dioxide was used as an indigestible marker. Digesta samples were collected for 9 h after meal ingestion, and blood samples were collected at ten time points during the same period. Total nitrogen (N) and AA contents were determined. Data were statistically analysed using linear mixed models. The TID of total N was not different between WRP and GGRP (81-84 %, <i>P</i> > 0·05). The first-limiting AA was Trp for both ingredients, with a DIAAS much higher for GGRP than for WRP (74 and 10 % for adults, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0·001). Postprandial plasma AA concentration peaked earlier for WRP (3 h) than for GGRP (5 h). Plasma concentrations of total and essential AA were higher (<i>P</i> < 0·001) with GGRP diet than WRP diet. Overall, GGRP has a nutritional quality suitable to meet the needs of adults for AA, while WRP needs to be supplemented with other protein sources to fulfil the dietary requirements.

British Journal Of NutritionVol. 132(10)
Institut Agro Rennes-Angers (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Science et Technologie du Lait et de l'Oeuf (FR), Core Laboratories (United States) (US)
Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.