Scaling‐up community‐based resource management in Solomon Islands

Abstract This perspective reflects on conservation efforts to increase the coverage of marine protected areas in Solomon Islands. We demonstrate that the current model in which international conservation NGOs provide technical and financial support to pilot projects, from which community‐based resource management will spontaneously spread, is misguided. These site‐based projects typically require substantial financial resources, ignore external threats to coastal ecosystems, and tend to bypass existing governance structures, which makes replication in other areas highly problematic. We argue that to effectively support indigenous peoples and local communities in the management of marine resources and, thereby, achieve biodiversity conservation outcomes at scale, it is necessary to move away from site‐based conservation projects and focus instead on strengthening the capability of government agencies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13264
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scaling‐up community‐based resource management in Solomon Islands

Meshach Sukulu, Hampus Eriksson, Jan van der Ploeg, Hugh Govan
1 citations
Conservation Science and Practice
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
1.71
article

Scaling‐up community‐based resource management in Solomon Islands

Meshach Sukulu, Hampus Eriksson, Jan van der Ploeg, Hugh Govan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This perspective reflects on conservation efforts to increase the coverage of marine protected areas in Solomon Islands. We demonstrate that the current model in which international conservation NGOs provide technical and financial support to pilot projects, from which community‐based resource management will spontaneously spread, is misguided. These site‐based projects typically require substantial financial resources, ignore external threats to coastal ecosystems, and tend to bypass existing governance structures, which makes replication in other areas highly problematic. We argue that to effectively support indigenous peoples and local communities in the management of marine resources and, thereby, achieve biodiversity conservation outcomes at scale, it is necessary to move away from site‐based conservation projects and focus instead on strengthening the capability of government agencies.

Conservation Science and PracticeVol. 6(12)
University of Wollongong (AU), Van Hall Larenstein University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of the South Pacific (FJ), WorldFish (MY)
Asian Development Bank, Australian Government, European Commission, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
1.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.