How to Validate a Bayesian Evolutionary Model

Biology has become a highly mathematical discipline in which probabilistic models play a central role. As a result, research in the biological sciences is now dependent on computational tools capable of carrying out complex analyses. These tools must be validated before they can be used, but what is understood as validation varies widely among methodological contributions. This may be a consequence of the still embryonic stage of the literature on statistical software validation for computational biology. Our manuscript aims to advance this literature. Here, we describe, illustrate, and introduce new good practices for assessing the correctness of a model implementation with an emphasis on Bayesian methods. We also introduce a suite of functionalities for automating validation protocols. It is our hope that the guidelines presented here help sharpen the focus of discussions on (as well as elevate) expected standards of statistical software for biology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systematic Biology
Published
2024-11-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syae064
Citations
14
Primary Topic
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to Validate a Bayesian Evolutionary Model

Remco Bouckaert, Luiz Max Carvalho, Fábio K. Mendes, Alexei J. Drummond
14 citations
Systematic Biology
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
7.70
article

How to Validate a Bayesian Evolutionary Model

Remco Bouckaert, Luiz Max Carvalho, Fábio K. Mendes, Alexei J. Drummond
article en
14 citations

Abstract

Biology has become a highly mathematical discipline in which probabilistic models play a central role. As a result, research in the biological sciences is now dependent on computational tools capable of carrying out complex analyses. These tools must be validated before they can be used, but what is understood as validation varies widely among methodological contributions. This may be a consequence of the still embryonic stage of the literature on statistical software validation for computational biology. Our manuscript aims to advance this literature. Here, we describe, illustrate, and introduce new good practices for assessing the correctness of a model implementation with an emphasis on Bayesian methods. We also introduce a suite of functionalities for automating validation protocols. It is our hope that the guidelines presented here help sharpen the focus of discussions on (as well as elevate) expected standards of statistical software for biology.

Systematic BiologyVol. 74(1)
Louisiana State University (US), University of Auckland (NZ), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
National Science Foundation, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
7.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.