Perspective on LC-MS(/MS) for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis: a consolidation of more than a decade of experience across the European Bioanalysis Forum community (Part 2: “The How”)

Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioanalysis
Published
2024-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17576180.2024.2418251
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.24
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective on LC-MS(/MS) for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis: a consolidation of more than a decade of experience across the European Bioanalysis Forum community (Part 2: “The How”)

Philip Timmerman, Nico van de Merbel, Stephané Muccio, Sune Hove Sporring et al.
1 citations
Bioanalysis
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.24
article

Perspective on LC-MS(/MS) for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis: a consolidation of more than a decade of experience across the European Bioanalysis Forum community (Part 2: “The How”)

Philip Timmerman, Nico van de Merbel, Stephané Muccio, Sune Hove Sporring, Fabrizia Fusetti, Gregor Jordan, Mark Jean Gnoth, Matthew Barfield, Peter Blattmann, Michael Blackburn, Amanda Wilson, Rob Wheller, Benno Ingelse, Iain Love
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Following up on our most recent discussion paper focussing on the continued regulatory challenges for bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS, the European Bioanalysis Forum reports back on their internal discussions on and experience with method development for biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins in research and regulated Bioanalysis. Due to the broad array of topics discussed, this information is spread over two research papers, where one focusses on the fundamental principles on which the technology is built (i.e., the what) and another on the practical considerations (i.e., the how). In this paper, we discuss 'the how'. Both papers should be helpful for the bioanalytical community to better understand the challenges and provide an insight on why bioanalysis of biotherapeutic and biomarker proteins with LC-MS/MS should not be compared with the more traditional LC-MS/MS assay for small molecules or ligand binding assays for biotherapeutics.

BioanalysisVol. 17(2)
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom) (GB), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), LabCorp (United States) (US), Sanofi (France) (FR), Bioanalytica (Switzerland) (CH), The Institute of Conservation (GB), Roche Pharma AG (Germany) (DE), Charles River Laboratories (United Kingdom) (GB), Toscana Biomarkers (Italy) (IT), Protein Express (United States) (US), Genmab (Netherlands) (NL), Roche (United Kingdom) (GB), AstraZeneca (Singapore) (SG), Novo Nordisk (United Kingdom) (GB), Quotient Clinical (United Kingdom) (GB), Idorsia (Switzerland) (CH), Idera Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US), Bayer (France) (FR), Biographics (United States) (US), Bayer (Germany) (DE), Idiap Research Institute (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 41%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
0.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.