Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study examined acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with short activity breaks on postprandial glucose/insulin responses and estimations of insulin sensitivity in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). <b><i>Method:</i></b> In a randomized crossover trial, eight adults (age = 46 ± 14 years [mean ± SD], body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy completed two 6-h conditions as follows: uninterrupted sitting (SIT) and sitting interrupted with 3-min bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) every 30 min. Basal and bolus insulin were standardized across conditions except in cases of hypoglycemia. Postprandial responses were assessed using incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) and total AUC (tAUC) from half-hourly venous sampling. Meal-based insulin sensitivity determined from glucose sensor and insulin pump (S<i><sub>i</sub></i><sup>SP</sup>) was assessed from flash continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump data. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed models adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Glucose iAUC did not differ by condition (SIT: 19.8 ± 3.0 [estimated marginal means ± standard error] vs. SRA: 14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.086). Despite CSII being standardized between conditions, insulin iAUC was higher in SRA compared to SIT (137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < 0.001). This resulted in a lower glucose response relative to the change in plasma insulin in SRA (tAUCglu/tAUCins: 0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Si<sup>SP</sup> was also higher at dinner following the SRA condition, with no between-condition differences at breakfast or lunch. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Regularly interrupting prolonged sitting in T1D may increase plasma insulin and improve insulin sensitivity when meals and CSII are standardized. Future studies should explore underlying mechanistic determinants and the applicability of findings to those on multiple daily injections. <b><i>Trial Registration:</i></b> Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0146
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial

Parneet Sethi, Kym Rickards, Robyn N. Larsen, Richard J. MacIsaac et al.
3 citations
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Management and Research
1.07
article

Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial

Parneet Sethi, Kym Rickards, Robyn N. Larsen, Richard J. MacIsaac, David Wayne Dunstan, Kavita Kumareswaran, David Norman O'Neal, Melitta A. McNarry, Frances Taylor, Ashleigh R. Homer, Sybil A. McAuley, Neville G. Owen, Neale Cohen, Paddy C. Dempsey
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study examined acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with short activity breaks on postprandial glucose/insulin responses and estimations of insulin sensitivity in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). <b><i>Method:</i></b> In a randomized crossover trial, eight adults (age = 46 ± 14 years [mean ± SD], body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy completed two 6-h conditions as follows: uninterrupted sitting (SIT) and sitting interrupted with 3-min bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) every 30 min. Basal and bolus insulin were standardized across conditions except in cases of hypoglycemia. Postprandial responses were assessed using incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) and total AUC (tAUC) from half-hourly venous sampling. Meal-based insulin sensitivity determined from glucose sensor and insulin pump (S<i><sub>i</sub></i><sup>SP</sup>) was assessed from flash continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump data. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed models adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Glucose iAUC did not differ by condition (SIT: 19.8 ± 3.0 [estimated marginal means ± standard error] vs. SRA: 14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.086). Despite CSII being standardized between conditions, insulin iAUC was higher in SRA compared to SIT (137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < 0.001). This resulted in a lower glucose response relative to the change in plasma insulin in SRA (tAUCglu/tAUCins: 0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Si<sup>SP</sup> was also higher at dinner following the SRA condition, with no between-condition differences at breakfast or lunch. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Regularly interrupting prolonged sitting in T1D may increase plasma insulin and improve insulin sensitivity when meals and CSII are standardized. Future studies should explore underlying mechanistic determinants and the applicability of findings to those on multiple daily injections. <b><i>Trial Registration:</i></b> Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au).

Diabetes Technology & TherapeuticsVol. 27(2)
Australian Research Council (AU), Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU), Deakin University (AU), University of Leicester (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), Diabetes Australia (AU), The Alfred Hospital (AU), Swansea University (GB), St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU), Cabrini Hospital (AU), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB), Alfred Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), Australian Catholic University (AU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Diabetes Management and Research
1.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.