Non-take-up of in-work benefits: determinants, benefit erosion and indexing

Abstract Non-take-up of welfare schemes is a key concern of policy effectiveness. Building on studies that have shown the low take-up of minimum income schemes, our case study of Ireland’s Working Family Payment is the first to analyse non-take-up of an in-work benefit and its determinants with a special focus on labour market factors. Based on EU-SILC (2014–2019) we estimate a non-take-up rate between 63 and 76%, which poses a major obstacle for effective poverty prevention. Moreover, we stress that non-take-up of in-work benefits differs to minimum income schemes. We provide new evidence on how labour market characteristics play an important role in explaining non-take-up, especially self-employment and the interaction with unemployment benefits. Benefit erosion is a key factor in declining eligibility, which should be addressed by indexing wages and prices. Furthermore, we propose policy reforms around automatic enrolment or tax credits to mitigate non-take-up and alleviate in-work poverty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for Labour Market Research
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-024-00385-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.70

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-take-up of in-work benefits: determinants, benefit erosion and indexing

Stephan Köppe, Diego Muñoz-Higueras, Amadeo Fuenmayor Fernández, Rafael Granell Pérez
2 citations
Journal for Labour Market Research
Employment and Welfare Studies
1.70
article

Non-take-up of in-work benefits: determinants, benefit erosion and indexing

Stephan Köppe, Diego Muñoz-Higueras, Amadeo Fuenmayor Fernández, Rafael Granell Pérez
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Non-take-up of welfare schemes is a key concern of policy effectiveness. Building on studies that have shown the low take-up of minimum income schemes, our case study of Ireland’s Working Family Payment is the first to analyse non-take-up of an in-work benefit and its determinants with a special focus on labour market factors. Based on EU-SILC (2014–2019) we estimate a non-take-up rate between 63 and 76%, which poses a major obstacle for effective poverty prevention. Moreover, we stress that non-take-up of in-work benefits differs to minimum income schemes. We provide new evidence on how labour market characteristics play an important role in explaining non-take-up, especially self-employment and the interaction with unemployment benefits. Benefit erosion is a key factor in declining eligibility, which should be addressed by indexing wages and prices. Furthermore, we propose policy reforms around automatic enrolment or tax credits to mitigate non-take-up and alleviate in-work poverty.

Journal for Labour Market ResearchVol. 58(1)
University College Dublin (IE), Universitat de València (ES), Social Justice Ireland (IE)
Generalitat Valenciana
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Employment and Welfare Studies
1.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-take-up of in-work benefits: determinants, benefit erosion and indexing — Stephan Köppe, Diego Muñoz-Higueras, et al. · Journal for Labour Market Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS