How to best assess shedder status: a comparison of popular shedder tests

"Shedder status" describes the inherent variation between individuals to leave touch DNA on a surface through direct contact. Depending on the amount and quality of DNA or cellular deposition, individuals are typically deemed high, intermediate, or low shedders. Although many shedder tests have been described, variability in study design and categorisation criteria has limited the ability of researchers to accurately compare results, as well as accrue the necessary population data. As activity level reporting becomes more common, the need for reliable and standardised testing increases. To assess reproducibility, this study compared shedder status data generated by six participants using three different shedder tests, as modified from the literature. This involved DNA quantification and profiling of a handprint made on a glass plate, DNA quantification and profiling of a grip mark made on a plastic conical tube, and cell scoring of a Diamond™ Dye-stained fingermark. All participants washed and dried their hands fifteen minutes before each deposit. To assess the impact of behaviour on shedder designation, participants either refrained from activity or went about their daily tasks during this wait. The shedder status of participants changed between tests, as DNA-based testing often generated lower shedder statuses than cell scores. Further, when different categorisation methods were applied to a single test, intra-person variability increased as the number of shedder designations increased from two (low/high) to five (low/low-intermediate/intermediate/intermediate-high/high). Moving forward, the utilisation of a single shedder test and standardised categorisation criteria is needed to employ shedder testing in forensic casework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-024-03351-8
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to best assess shedder status: a comparison of popular shedder tests

Mariya Goray, Dehghan Ali, Adrian M. T. Linacre, Roland A. H. van Oorschot
5 citations
International Journal of Legal Medicine
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
4.25
article

How to best assess shedder status: a comparison of popular shedder tests

Mariya Goray, Dehghan Ali, Adrian M. T. Linacre, Roland A. H. van Oorschot
article en
5 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.

International Journal of Legal MedicineVol. 139(3)
Victoria Police (AU), Flinders University (AU), La Trobe University (AU)
Flinders University
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
4.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.