The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View

Abstract Trust in science post-Covid appears to be a complex matter. On the one hand, the COVID-19 pandemic added value to the epistemic trustworthiness of scientific opinion and its potential to drive evidence-based policies, while it also spurred scientific distrust and societal polarization (e.g., vaccines), especially on social media. In this work we sought to understand the ways in which trust in science might be bolstered by adopting a multistakeholder perspective. This objective was achieved by considering stakeholders’ views on (a) how perceived key actors affect trust in science, and (b) what proposed actions can be taken by each actor identified. Data were collected using 16 focus groups and 10 individual interviews across different European contexts with general public ( n = 66), journalists ( n = 23) and scientists ( n = 35), and were analysed using thematic analysis. Regarding how perceived key actors affect trust in science, participants viewed policymakers, media, scientific and social media actors as occupying a dual function (facilitators and hinderers of trust in science), and pointed to the value of multi-actor collaboration. Regarding what actions should be taken for enhancing trust in science, participants indicated the value of enhancing understanding of scientific integrity and practices, through science literacy and science communication, and also pointed to social media platform regulation. Implications stemming from the data are discussed, considering how multiple identified stewards of trust can contribute to an ecosystem of trust.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ethics
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09583-y
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Risk Perception and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View

Josephina Antoniou, Pamela Bartar, Christiana Varda, Lisa Häberlein et al.
7 citations
Journal of Academic Ethics
Risk Perception and Management
7.92
article

The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science: A Multistakeholder View

Josephina Antoniou, Pamela Bartar, Christiana Varda, Lisa Häberlein, Evren Yalaz, Gábor Szüdi, Kalypso Iordanou, Agata Gurzawska, Mariano Martín Zamorano
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Trust in science post-Covid appears to be a complex matter. On the one hand, the COVID-19 pandemic added value to the epistemic trustworthiness of scientific opinion and its potential to drive evidence-based policies, while it also spurred scientific distrust and societal polarization (e.g., vaccines), especially on social media. In this work we sought to understand the ways in which trust in science might be bolstered by adopting a multistakeholder perspective. This objective was achieved by considering stakeholders’ views on (a) how perceived key actors affect trust in science, and (b) what proposed actions can be taken by each actor identified. Data were collected using 16 focus groups and 10 individual interviews across different European contexts with general public ( n = 66), journalists ( n = 23) and scientists ( n = 35), and were analysed using thematic analysis. Regarding how perceived key actors affect trust in science, participants viewed policymakers, media, scientific and social media actors as occupying a dual function (facilitators and hinderers of trust in science), and pointed to the value of multi-actor collaboration. Regarding what actions should be taken for enhancing trust in science, participants indicated the value of enhancing understanding of scientific integrity and practices, through science literacy and science communication, and also pointed to social media platform regulation. Implications stemming from the data are discussed, considering how multiple identified stewards of trust can contribute to an ecosystem of trust.

Journal of Academic EthicsVol. 23(3)
Trilateral Research & Consulting (GB), University of Central Lancashire Cyprus (CY), Centre for Social Innovation (CA)
European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Risk Perception and Management
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.