Medium and large mammal responses to fire in a neotropical savanna system in Guyana

Abstract Fire management remains controversial worldwide, in spite of longstanding Indigenous burning practices that have shown benefits to biodiversity. In the Neotropics, limited information is available on wildlife response to fire, particularly for medium and large mammals. We conducted 1 year of transect surveys to detect signs and live sightings of mammals in the Rupununi, Guyana, within a habitat matrix of savanna, wetland, and forest, where Indigenous fire management is practiced. Species richness showed a non‐linear relationship with time since fire. The number of live observations decreased with time since fire. Individual species responded differently, and this may be explained by habitat preference and post‐fire resource availability. Savanna species—giant anteater ( Myrmecophaga tridactyla ), nine‐banded armadillo ( Dasypus novemcinctus ), and crab‐eating fox ( Cerdocyon thous )—favored fire, while forest‐associated species—agouti ( Dasyprocta leporina ) and tapir ( Tapirus terrestris )—avoided fire prone areas, although some species showed no such response. Our data suggest that mammals in the Rupununi show an ecological response to traditional fire management practices, but that fires affecting forested areas or forest connectivity could negatively impact wildlife. We recommend the promotion of traditional knowledge of fire and fire management among Indigenous Peoples, and the integration of this expertise to inform fire management policies. Combining traditional and scientific knowledge may help people and wildlife adapt to fire regimes that are increasingly driven by climate change and anthropogenic activities within fire prone savanna and forest landscapes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biotropica
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.13397
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medium and large mammal responses to fire in a neotropical savanna system in Guyana

Maísa Santos Joaquim, Brian J. O’Shea, Matthew Lewis, Nathalie van Vliet et al.
2 citations
Biotropica
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
article

Medium and large mammal responses to fire in a neotropical savanna system in Guyana

Maísa Santos Joaquim, Brian J. O’Shea, Matthew Lewis, Nathalie van Vliet, Matthew T. Hallett, Evi A. D. Paemelaere, Kayla De Freitas, Susan Balvadore, Maxi Ignace, Allan Mandook, Nicholas Mandook, Leroy Igancio
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Fire management remains controversial worldwide, in spite of longstanding Indigenous burning practices that have shown benefits to biodiversity. In the Neotropics, limited information is available on wildlife response to fire, particularly for medium and large mammals. We conducted 1 year of transect surveys to detect signs and live sightings of mammals in the Rupununi, Guyana, within a habitat matrix of savanna, wetland, and forest, where Indigenous fire management is practiced. Species richness showed a non‐linear relationship with time since fire. The number of live observations decreased with time since fire. Individual species responded differently, and this may be explained by habitat preference and post‐fire resource availability. Savanna species—giant anteater ( Myrmecophaga tridactyla ), nine‐banded armadillo ( Dasypus novemcinctus ), and crab‐eating fox ( Cerdocyon thous )—favored fire, while forest‐associated species—agouti ( Dasyprocta leporina ) and tapir ( Tapirus terrestris )—avoided fire prone areas, although some species showed no such response. Our data suggest that mammals in the Rupununi show an ecological response to traditional fire management practices, but that fires affecting forested areas or forest connectivity could negatively impact wildlife. We recommend the promotion of traditional knowledge of fire and fire management among Indigenous Peoples, and the integration of this expertise to inform fire management policies. Combining traditional and scientific knowledge may help people and wildlife adapt to fire regimes that are increasingly driven by climate change and anthropogenic activities within fire prone savanna and forest landscapes.

BiotropicaVol. 57(1)
North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences (US), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Leverhulme Trust (GB), Zoo Miami (US), University of Florida (US), Life Services (United States) (US), Centre For Wildlife Studies (IN), Launchpad Central (United States) (US), Imperial College London (GB), Center for International Forestry Research (ID), University of Guyana (GY)
European Commission
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Fire effects on ecosystems
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.