Impact of axial strain on linear, transitional and self-similar turbulent mixing layers

In convergent geometry, the effect of convergence and compression on the Rayleigh–Taylor instability (RTI) and Richtmyer–Meshkov instability (RMI) modifies the growth rate and behaviour of the instabilities. In order to better understand how compression/expansion caused by axial strain rates (i.e. strain rates normal to the interface) change the instability dynamics, axial strain rates are applied to RMI in planar geometry, isolated from the effects of convergence. Potential flow theory for the linear regime shows the growth rate of the instability is modified to include the background velocity difference of the instability's width. Resolved two-dimensional simulations of single-mode RMI showed the potential flow model is accurate whilst the amplitude is small compared with the wavelength. The application of strain rate to an RMI-induced mixing layer was investigated using three-dimensional implicit large eddy simulations (ILES) of the quarter-scale $\theta$ -group case by Thornber et al. ( Phys. Fluids , vol. 29, 2017, 105107). Whilst the background strain rate contributed to the mixing layer's growth, it was to a smaller extent than expected. The shear production of axial turbulent kinetic energy from the strain rate modified the rate of bulk entrainment, affecting the mixing layer's growth and mixedness, such that the strained simulations no longer attained the same self-similar state. The capability of the buoyancy-drag model by Youngs & Thornber ( Physica D, vol. 410, 2020, 132517) to predict the mixing layer width was investigated, using a model calibrated to the unstrained case. New terms were introduced into the buoyancy-drag model, which correspond to the shear production of turbulent kinetic energy.