Evaluation of Three High-Resolution Satellite and Meteorological Reanalysis Precipitation Datasets over the Yellow River Basin in China

Recently, Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for the Global Precipitation Measurement (IMERG) mission and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) precipitation datasets have been widely used in remote sensing and atmospheric studies, respectively, because of their high accuracy. A dataset of 268 site-gauge precipitation measurements over the Yellow River Basin in China was used in this study to comprehensively evaluate the performance of three high-resolution precipitation products, each with a spatial resolution of 0.1°, consisting of two satellite-derived datasets, IMERG and multisource weighted-ensemble precipitation (MSWEP), and one ERA5-derived dataset, ERA5-Land. The results revealed that the spatial distribution of IMERG annual precipitation closely resembled that of the observed rainfall and generally exhibited a downward trend from southeast to northwest. Among the three products, IMERG had the best performance at the annual scale, whereas ERA5-Land had the worst performance due to significant overestimation. Specifically, IMERG demonstrated the highest correlation coefficient (CC) above 0.8 and the lowest BIAS and root mean square error (RMSE), with values in most regions of 24.79 mm/a and less than 100 mm/a, respectively, whereas ERA5-Land presented the highest RMSE exceeding 500 mm/a, BIAS of 1265.7 mm/a, and the lowest CC below 0.2 in most regions. At the season scale, IMERG also exhibited the best performance across all four seasons, with a maximum of 17.99 mm/a in summer and a minimum of 0.55 mm/a in winter. Following IMERG, the MSWEP data closely aligned with the observations over the entire area in summer, southern China in spring and winter, and middle China in autumn. In addition, IMERG presented the highest Kling–Gupta efficiency coefficient (KGE) of 0.823 at the annual scale and the highest KGE (>0.77) across all four seasons among the three products compared with ERA5-Land and MSWEP, which had KEG values of −2.718 and −0.403, respectively. Notably, ERA5-Land exhibited a significant positive deviation from the observations at both the annual and seasonal scales, whereas the other products presented relatively smaller biases.