Development of the organizational animalistic dehumanization scale

Abstract This study reports the development of a new organizational animalistic dehumanization scale. Two longitudinal studies were conducted to validate the scale. In Study 1, 667 American participants participated in an online survey at Time (1) Two factors, namely organizational animalistic dehumanization (OAS) and organizational subservience and loyalty (OSL), were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). At Time 2, 574 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model. The new scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergence, and predictive validity. Study 2 reported the validation study of the Chinese-translated organizational animalistic dehumanization scale. 420 Chinese working adults in Hong Kong were recruited and matched their responses in the two-wave surveys. In line with Study 1, a two-factor solution was obtained and supported in the EFA and CFA. The translated scale also demonstrated good psychometric properties, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Finally, the animalistic dehumanization scales at Time 1 correlated significantly with criterion variables measured at Time (2) Limitations and implications were discussed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Psychology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06877-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Education and Professional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the organizational animalistic dehumanization scale

Francis Cheung
1 citations
Current Psychology
Education and Professional Development
2.10
article

Development of the organizational animalistic dehumanization scale

Francis Cheung
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study reports the development of a new organizational animalistic dehumanization scale. Two longitudinal studies were conducted to validate the scale. In Study 1, 667 American participants participated in an online survey at Time (1) Two factors, namely organizational animalistic dehumanization (OAS) and organizational subservience and loyalty (OSL), were extracted from the exploratory factor analysis (EFA). At Time 2, 574 participants were included. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the two-factor model. The new scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergence, and predictive validity. Study 2 reported the validation study of the Chinese-translated organizational animalistic dehumanization scale. 420 Chinese working adults in Hong Kong were recruited and matched their responses in the two-wave surveys. In line with Study 1, a two-factor solution was obtained and supported in the EFA and CFA. The translated scale also demonstrated good psychometric properties, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Finally, the animalistic dehumanization scales at Time 1 correlated significantly with criterion variables measured at Time (2) Limitations and implications were discussed.

Current PsychologyVol. 43(44)
Lingnan University
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Education and Professional Development
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.