Evaluating India’s FDI as a nonparticipant in the Belt and Road Initiative: synthetic control method analysis

Purpose The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was launched in 2013 and implemented the following year, marking 11 years since its inception. During this time, numerous research papers have been published that analyse the initiative’s objectives, targets and potential outcomes. This study aims to assess India’s resilience in joining the BRI by examining its net foreign direct investment (FDI) compared to a counterfactual scenario involving participation in the initiative. Design/methodology/approach The synthetic control method (SCM) will be used using a panel of 27 countries from 1990 to 2021. Findings The findings reveal that India’s FDI trajectory has decreased compared to that of synthetic India constructed from BRI member countries. Research limitations/implications This research outcome can assist India and other nations that are contemplating joining the BRI to systematically evaluate the potential political and economic risks and benefits associated with the initiative. This evaluation can guide individual decision-making processes regarding the BRI on a case-by-case basis and with other outcomes that are deemed viable to each country. Originality/value This research is distinct from other studies because it uses a novel SCM analysis, which is a quasi-experimental technique that assesses actual outcomes rather than predicting them, as in conventional regression models. In addition, previous research has primarily focused on the political aspects of the initiative; however this study focuses on the economic aspect of the BRI by evaluating its impact on FDI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jcefts-03-2024-0020
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating India’s FDI as a nonparticipant in the Belt and Road Initiative: synthetic control method analysis

Ahmed A. El-Sheikh, Eman Elish
1 citations
Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies
International Development and Aid
1.40
article

Evaluating India’s FDI as a nonparticipant in the Belt and Road Initiative: synthetic control method analysis

Ahmed A. El-Sheikh, Eman Elish
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) was launched in 2013 and implemented the following year, marking 11 years since its inception. During this time, numerous research papers have been published that analyse the initiative’s objectives, targets and potential outcomes. This study aims to assess India’s resilience in joining the BRI by examining its net foreign direct investment (FDI) compared to a counterfactual scenario involving participation in the initiative. Design/methodology/approach The synthetic control method (SCM) will be used using a panel of 27 countries from 1990 to 2021. Findings The findings reveal that India’s FDI trajectory has decreased compared to that of synthetic India constructed from BRI member countries. Research limitations/implications This research outcome can assist India and other nations that are contemplating joining the BRI to systematically evaluate the potential political and economic risks and benefits associated with the initiative. This evaluation can guide individual decision-making processes regarding the BRI on a case-by-case basis and with other outcomes that are deemed viable to each country. Originality/value This research is distinct from other studies because it uses a novel SCM analysis, which is a quasi-experimental technique that assesses actual outcomes rather than predicting them, as in conventional regression models. In addition, previous research has primarily focused on the political aspects of the initiative; however this study focuses on the economic aspect of the BRI by evaluating its impact on FDI.

Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade StudiesVol. 18(1)
British University in Egypt (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
International Development and Aid
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.