Machine learning for outcome prediction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the GLORIA-AF registry

Clinical risk scores that predict outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have modest predictive value. Machine learning (ML) may achieve greater results when predicting adverse outcomes in patients with recently diagnosed AF. Several ML models were tested and compared with current clinical risk scores on a cohort of 26,183 patients (mean age 70.13 (standard deviation 10.13); 44.8% female) with non-valvular AF. Inputted into the ML models were 23 demographic variables alongside comorbidities and current treatments. For one-year stroke prediction, ML achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.653 (95% confidence interval 0.576-0.730), compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores performance of 0.587 (95% CI 0.559-0.615) and 0.535 (95% CI 0.521-0.550), respectively. Using ML for one-year major bleed prediction increased the AUC from 0.537 (95% CI 0.518-0.557) generated by the HAS-BLED score to 0.677 (95% CI 0.619-0.724). ML was able to predict one-year and three-year all-cause mortality with an AUC of 0.734 (95% CI 0.696-0.771) and 0.742 (95% CI 0.718-0.766). In this study a significant improvement in performance was observed when transitioning from clinical risk scores to machine learning-based approaches across all applications tested. Obtaining precise prediction tools is desirable for increased interventions to reduce event rates.Trial Registry https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01468701, NCT01671007, NCT01937377.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-11-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-78120-z
Citations
10
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for outcome prediction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the GLORIA-AF registry

Stephanie L. Harrison, Menno V. Huisman, Martha Joddrell, Gregory Y.H. Lip et al.
10 citations
Scientific Reports
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
4.02
article

Machine learning for outcome prediction in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the GLORIA-AF registry

Stephanie L. Harrison, Menno V. Huisman, Martha Joddrell, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Wahbi K. El‐Bouri, Yalin Zheng
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Clinical risk scores that predict outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have modest predictive value. Machine learning (ML) may achieve greater results when predicting adverse outcomes in patients with recently diagnosed AF. Several ML models were tested and compared with current clinical risk scores on a cohort of 26,183 patients (mean age 70.13 (standard deviation 10.13); 44.8% female) with non-valvular AF. Inputted into the ML models were 23 demographic variables alongside comorbidities and current treatments. For one-year stroke prediction, ML achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.653 (95% confidence interval 0.576-0.730), compared to the CHADS<sub>2</sub> and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores performance of 0.587 (95% CI 0.559-0.615) and 0.535 (95% CI 0.521-0.550), respectively. Using ML for one-year major bleed prediction increased the AUC from 0.537 (95% CI 0.518-0.557) generated by the HAS-BLED score to 0.677 (95% CI 0.619-0.724). ML was able to predict one-year and three-year all-cause mortality with an AUC of 0.734 (95% CI 0.696-0.771) and 0.742 (95% CI 0.718-0.766). In this study a significant improvement in performance was observed when transitioning from clinical risk scores to machine learning-based approaches across all applications tested. Obtaining precise prediction tools is desirable for increased interventions to reduce event rates.Trial Registry https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01468701, NCT01671007, NCT01937377.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
University of Liverpool (GB), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB), Aalborg University (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
4.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.